Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

5/30/2017
05:10 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Bot-Driven Online Ad Fraud Losses Decline

But counterfeit ad inventory the next big worry for online advertisers.

For once, a bit of relatively good news in cybercrime: online ad fraud losses to corporate advertisers fell 10 percent this year even with an increase in digital ad spending.

That's the finding of a new study conducted by the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) and security firm White Ops, which tracked online ad traffic patterns of 49 ANA members, many of whom represent some of the nation's largest companies, as well as other digital ad activity from October 2016 through January 2017. ANA members who participated in the study include Coca Cola, Unilever, and Walmart, for example.

Online ad fraud losses for 2017 will drop to about $6.5 billion worldwide from $7.2 billion in lost revenue for corporate advertisers in 2016, the study found. Digital ad spending is forecast to increase by 10% this year, so the decline in fraud represents a positive trend in combating fraudulent bot activity, according to ANA and White Ops. ANA members overall will lose even less in revenue - some $3.3 billion worldwide, the study shows.

"This is the first year [of this study] that we have seen genuine decline" in losses to ad fraud, says Michael Tiffany, CEO of White Ops. "The cost of bot traffic that defeats detection has gone up; it used to be a fraction of a penny per visitor. Now the market price for a realistic-looking bot has risen to about a penny per visitor … It costs more to perpetuate [this crime]."

Bill Duggan, group enterprise vice president at ANA, says companies are getting savvier about online ad fraud. "Three years ago when we started this journey" to measure and prevent online ad fraud, he says, the problem was just a blip on ANA member radar screens. "Marketers are taking a bigger interest in fighting fraud" today, he says, and the data bears that out.

Criminals use bots against advertisers by giving the illusion of real ad views, and the botnet operators who run those phony website visitors make money via cash-out points.

Bots continue to look more and more like humans in order to evade detection as phony traffic. Some 75% of the fraud spotted in the study was the handiwork of a computer plus a human on the same endpoint. Meanwhile, mobile ad fraud represents a tiny portion of the fraud landscape, with under 2%, the report found.

Craig Spiezle, founder of the Online Trust Alliance, says programmatic advertising marketing may be efficient, but it comes with security and trust risks. "There's a difference between efficiency and effectiveness: yes, you sell ads quickly, and inventory is great, but effectiveness [is low] because you don't know if your ad is being viewed or seen," he says.

White Ops' Tiffany says some programmatic ad-buying operations are improving now, given the fraud problems. "Several programmatic platforms have gone above and beyond instituting new security controls to tackle the problem," he says.

The next big thing: counterfeit inventory, he says. "We are seeing an increasing amount of counterfeit inventory. That was the kind of attack that Methbot did," Tiffany says. "Not just fake visitors but entirely fake inventory that purports to be real ads running on real websites, but it exists in the ether."

Methbot was a massive online advertising fraud operation run by Russian cybercriminals that was stealing up to $5 million per day from big-name US advertisers by posing as some 6,000 major US media sites, including The Huffington Post, Fortune, ESPN, CBS Sports, and Fox News, and generating fake ad impressions. Discovered in late 2016, Methbot had been operating in plain sight for three years, using its own internal botnet infrastructure rather than than the traditional ad fraud model of infecting unsuspecting consumers to do the dirty work.

Related Content:

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
9/7/2017 | 1:15:45 PM
IBM and Watson
If I read one more post anywhere about how Watson can save every single problem in the western world through AI knoelege ..... while Lady Ginny at IBM is gutting cloud and Watson staff like crazy???    Can Watcon improve IBM revenue gone bad for 21 quarters???  AI may be great but it is NOT a total solution until itself.  Anybody remember what WOPR was and damn near did?
Eduardo.Master
50%
50%
Eduardo.Master,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/7/2017 | 12:05:29 PM
Re: Ad fraud is a big problem
Can Machine Learning Help Organizations Improve Data Security?
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
5/31/2017 | 9:39:26 AM
Re: Ad fraud is a big problem
Given that losses are still in the billions of dollars, indeed it is still a huge problem. Cleaning up the pollution in the ad ecosystem entails the cooperation of all players, and continuing to make it too expensive for the bad guys to target this space.
floydophone
50%
50%
floydophone,
User Rank: Author
5/30/2017 | 11:28:40 PM
Ad fraud is a big problem
Even though it seems to be declining, ad fraud is still a big problem. There's a lot of great coverage on the Software Engineeering Daily podcast about ad fraud and various mitigation techniques. At the end of the day, I think CPA mitigates a lot of the problem but it'll be a long time until we're fully there.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
New 'Nanodegree' Program Provides Hands-On Cybersecurity Training
Nicole Ferraro, Contributing Writer,  8/3/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15820
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, the markdown parser could disclose hidden file existence.
CVE-2020-15821
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, a user without permission is able to create an article draft.
CVE-2020-15823
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.8873 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Workflow component.
CVE-2020-15824
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.4.0, there is a script-cache privilege escalation vulnerability due to kotlin-main-kts cached scripts in the system temp directory, which is shared by all users by default.
CVE-2020-15825
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.1, users with the Modify Group permission can elevate other users' privileges.