Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

NAC-in-the-Box, Jump Up

Vernier, ConSentry launch improvements to their Network Access Control appliances

Two of the leading makers of in-line network access control (NAC) appliances introduced new products today, improving enterprises' prospects for implementing the security technology without degrading network performance.

NAC -- a means of improving end point security by testing and remediating client devices before allowing them to join the network -- is a hot button in enterprises of all sizes these days. But many companies are deploying NAC as an out-of-band function because of concerns that in-line NAC devices might inhibit network performance or increase latency. Some users also have expressed concerns that NAC appliances do not offer sufficient remediation capabilities, such as intrusion prevention.

Today's announcements address those concerns. In one rollout, Vernier Networks launched its EdgeWall 8800, a NAC appliance that offers wire-speed authentication and validated access to all users on the network. The 8800 uses Cavium Networks' Octeon chip technology, giving the appliance faster performance than earlier models. The new device also offers an integrated intrusion detection and prevention (IDP) engine.

In the other launch, ConSentry Networks unveiled Release 3.0 of its LANShield OS and Insight Command Center, which combine LAN switching and NAC appliance capabilities. The new offerings deliver more information about end user activity on the network, as well as automatic authentication and simplified incident response, the company says.

Although their products are very different, both Vernier and ConSentry have a common goal: to convince enterprises that NAC can be done in-line, securing end user access without hindering network performance, notes Andrew Braunberg, an analyst at Current Analysis.

"The main reason for choosing out-of-band solutions is the performance issue," Braunberg says. "If you choose to do NAC in-line, then the whole issue of speeds and feeds becomes paramount."

Vernier is addressing the performance issue with the Cavium chip, an open microprocessor technology that accelerates the automated process of checking a user's security credentials before allowing him or her to log on. ConSentry uses a proprietary chip that it claims is optimized for NAC processing. Each vendor claims to be faster than the other, though no independent performance comparisons were available.

Most organizations have not deployed NAC at an enterprise level, so the question of who's faster may not be at the top of network and security managers' minds yet, Branberg observes.

"For most companies, the impetus behind NAC is guest access and how to ensure the security of outside devices that use the network, such as the ones used by partners or contractors," he says. "They're deploying NAC on a small scale, with maybe just one appliance attached to a conference room. It's a big jump from that sort of environment to an enterprise-wide NAC implementation."

That's not to say that the NAC market isn't ramping up quickly, Braunberg says. Medium-sized companies already are adopting the technology, particularly in the health care and higher education markets, he states. Research firm IDC predicts that the market for identity and access management systems, including NAC, will grow at a rate of nearly 25 percent per year to reach $2 billion in 2010.

Vernier's EdgeWall 8800 is available now with a starting price of $29,900. The total cost of the package can be as low as $25 per seat, officials say. ConSentry's LANShield Controller lists for $17,995, and the LANShield Switch costs $13,995.

Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • ConSentry Networks Inc.
  • Vernier Networks Inc.

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
    Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
    Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
    Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
    Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    Special Report: Computing's New Normal
    This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
    Flash Poll
    How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
    How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
    The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-15208
    PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
    In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
    CVE-2020-15209
    PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
    In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
    CVE-2020-15210
    PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
    In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
    CVE-2020-15211
    PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
    In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
    CVE-2020-15212
    PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
    In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...