Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

6/29/2016
02:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Legit Tools Helping Attackers Hide Malicious Activity, Study Finds

Malware often just used only for initial break-in, LightCyber report says.

Contrary to popular perception, cyber attackers rarely rely on malware after an initial intrusion to carry out their data exfiltration, surveillance, and other malicious campaigns on target networks.

Instead, a majority of them leverage legitimate IT tools and the native capabilities of the platform they are exploiting to move about undetected on a victim network, security vendor LightCyber found in a new study. As a result, organizations that are heavily focused on identifying and weeding out malware on their networks often completely miss active attacks.

LightCyber’s report is based on an analysis of anonymized data gathered from its customers via the company’s Magna Behavioral Attach Detection platform. It includes data on attack activity across hundreds of thousands of endpoint systems in 60 customer sites over a six-month period.

What the data shows is that attackers use malware typically just to gain an initial foothold on a victim network, says Kasey Cross, senior product manager, LightCyber.

Once inside a network, attackers often tend to use stolen credentials and legitimate networking, administration, remote desktop access, and penetration testing tools to try and expand their access and move laterally across the network in search of data other targets, Cross says. In most instances, malware detection tools completely miss such activity.

Not one of the desktop and administration tools that were used by adversaries in the attacks that LightCyber analyzed were flagged as malware by the Magna detection technology, Cross says. “Four of the remote desktop tools and one of the admin tools were classified as riskware, and the rest of the tools were deemed safe.”

The study showed that most organizations are looking in the wrong place for active attackers, according to Cross. “The industry average dwell time of five months directly reflects this failure,” she says.

“To successfully detect an intruder, organizations need to look for the operational activities of the attacker, which are best seen as malicious anomalies against profiles of normal activity for users and IP-connected devices," she says.

Black Hat USA returns to the fabulous Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada July 30 through Aug. 4, 2016. Click for information on the conference schedule and to register.

The LightCyber report examines the threats associated with the specific phases of a targeted campaign, starting with the initial intrusion and reconnaissance phase to lateral movement and data exfiltration.

The noisiest part of most campaigns was during the reconnaissance phase, when attackers are looking for specifics on the network and ways to get at those assets. “Attackers often turn to host and port scans to map out network resources. These scans provide an inventory of relevant targets, such as file and application servers,” LightCyber said in its report.

Once they have an idea of the network layout, they use dual-use administration and hacking tools to try and find exploitable vulnerabilities or to steal the credentials of administrative users.

The LightCyber report lists several of the tools that it discovered during its analysis. Among them were PingInfoView, Nmap, Ping, Mimikatz, Telnet, Private Shell SSH, VMware vSphere Client, TeamViewer, and WinVNC.

"Many of the top ten hacking tools are used both by attackers and by IT administrators or penetration testers,” Cross says. "So it is hard to classify whether they are legitimate programs. However, our cloud-based malware analysis system determined that zero of the tools were true malware, six were riskware or hacking tools, and four were considered safe.”

Related Content:

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
kbannan100
50%
50%
kbannan100,
User Rank: Moderator
7/7/2016 | 2:04:39 PM
Crazy stuff
Hackers are getting smarter -- and their goals aren't always common. Anyone remember the mass printer trolling that happened this spring when a well-known hacker sent hundreds of flyers to printers all over the country? It's time to start taking endpoint security more seriously and find a way to find hackers before they do their damage. 

Great blog post here about how to recognize a network attack: bit.ly/24j5iF9

--Karen Bannan, commenting for IDG and HP
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2021-33034
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2019-25044
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.