Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

1/4/2012
02:59 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Latest SQL Injection Campaign Infects 1 Million Web Pages

SANS warns of uptick in 'Lilupophilupop' attack, but Cisco says total number of infected URLs might be 'inflated'

Another SQL injection campaign is literally going viral, with some 1 million URLs possibly infected.

The SANS Internet Storm Center over the weekend counted some 1,070,000 URLs injected with the so-called lilupophilupop.com malware. That's up from 80 pages it had found in early December, according to SANS ISC handler Mark Hofman.

The attackers compromise sites via SQL injection, and it appears to have hit sites worldwide, with the most infections in The Netherlands "NL" domain, with 123,000, and includes some .com and .org sites, as well.

"At the moment it looks like it is partially automated and partially manual. The manual component and the number of sites infected suggests a reasonable size work force or a long preparation period," Hofman said in his blog post on the attack.

But the 1 million URL number might be inflated, says Mary Landesmann, senior security researcher for ScanSafe, which is part of Cisco. That count could include pages also discussing the attacks, she says. "As a result, there is always a huge 'increase' after an initial public report is made. In other words, counting the number of results from a search engine isn’t a good or viable means of measuring the breadth of a compromise," Landesmann says.

Cisco has seen around 650 unique domains hit since lilupophilupop attack first showed up at the end of November. Around 43 percent of the infections transpired between Nov. 30 and Dec. 2, according to Landesmann. "The domains that are affected seem pretty random and small, so I suspect spam or some other social-engineering method is driving victims to the compromised sites, in addition to SEO poisoning," she says.

Mass SQL injection attacks are nothing new. The most recent one, Lizamoon, hit some 500,000 URLs with redirects that push rogue AV software, but was quickly shut down. Automated exploitation is generated via a toolkit built for a specific attack, as was the case with Lizamoon. These attacks typically target a specific application architecture.

[How to prevent SQL injection attacks. See As SQL Injection Attacks Surge, New Report Offers Insight On How To Prevent Them.]

SQL injection basically manipulates an existing SQL query for malicious purposes -- an attacker can take full control over the underlying operating system of the SQL server as well as the Web application.

Unfortunately, SQL injection flaws are consistently some of the most prevalent ones in Web servers.

The lilupophilupop attacks represent one of the biggest SQL injection attacks recently, but it's still much smaller than the size of previous campaigns a few years ago, Cisco's Landesmann says.

"SQL injection isn’t the result of any specific vulnerability, but rather a result of improper input/output handling by the site. It will never entirely go away, but it’s definitely a much, much smaller problem today," she says. "Major hosting providers, large companies, and commercial sites have taken great strides to mitigate their susceptibility and, as a result, the days of a million plus pages/sites impacted by SQLi are probably well behind us."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
1/6/2012 | 11:36:26 PM
re: Latest SQL Injection Campaign Infects 1 Million Web Pages
For the developers: finding SQL injection and other vulnerabilities in code:
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Secur...-
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
How a Manufacturing Firm Recovered from a Devastating Ransomware Attack
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5798
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Lack of correct bounds checking in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5799
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect inheritance of a new document's policy in Content Security Policy in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5800
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Insufficient policy enforcement in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5801
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect eliding of URLs in Omnibox in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5802
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect handling of download origins in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page.