Attacks/Breaches

11/7/2018
02:30 PM
Satish Gannu
Satish Gannu
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

IT-to-OT Solutions That Can Bolster Security in the IIoT

Industrial companies can use the hard-won, long-fought lessons of IT to leapfrog to an advanced state of Industrial Internet of Things security.

First of a two-part series.

The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) — within companies and across the entire global IIoT ecosystem — is an intricately intertwined and negotiated merger of information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT). OT systems are not only business-critical, they can be nation-critical or life-and-death-critical. Unfortunately,  the convergence of IT and OT has created uncertainty within companies about the ownership and operation of OT security solutions, as have many disruptive evolutions. The result: an alarming 59% of companies are willing to "tolerate medium-to-high risk in relation to IoT security," according to Forrester. This is dangerously wrong.

As someone with experience on both sides of the IT/OT equation, I've realized how industrial companies can use the hard-won, long-fought lessons of IT to leapfrog to an advanced state of IIoT security — architected and deployed to meet OT's differentiated requirements. If one thinks of OT systems as another form of data center — the heavily protected core of enterprise IT — there are some promising ideas one can adapt from decades of IT experience to provide new levels of IIoT security while honoring the specific needs of OT. Here are three examples.

Separation of Endpoint Networks
IT has learned the security advantage of separating endpoint networks of PCs and mobile devices from the core data center. As people carry their company laptops around, they can get hooked on the addictive drug known as free Wi-Fi — connection anywhere. It's free, but dangerous. Those endpoints can easily become compromised.

So, IT has developed "border crossings" that separate endpoint networks from the data center until PCs and laptops pass rigorous vetting. Not just usernames, passwords, and authentication codes but complete border-crossing-style background checks: Where has that machine been? What has it been doing? What software is loaded on it? Has the machine been compromised by travel to countries known for cyber espionage? Levels of access to the data center are provided in keeping with the results of a machine's background check.

The number of users, and therefore endpoint machines, is smaller in OT than in IT, but the same separation, vetting, and "border crossing" background checks can be used to strengthen OT security, and thus the security of the entire IIoT enterprise.

Microsegmentation
Data centers are comprised of multiple machines. Traditionally, when users access the data center via one machine, they can access all machines. But in most cases, there's no need for a free-for-all in which every user can access every machine. Via microsegmentation, security officers study the interrelationship of machines to determine which machines must talk to which other machines, and they restrict access to necessary connections only. This materially reduces vulnerability and potential damage.

Much as we'd like to, it's impossible for anyone to guarantee 100% fail-safe IIoT security. Therefore, we harden what we can, and reduce attack surfaces to the bare minimum. By dividing networks into physically independent microsegments, we build security walls within security walls — on the assumption that bad guys will be able to get through one or two but not all of them. 

The good news in porting microsegmentation from IT to OT is that OT is in many ways a simpler world. Where IT is comprised of fluid technology stacks with multiple moving parts dedicated to the three-dimensional flow of data, OT systems are engineered primarily to optimize processes: things happen the same way all the time to produce a specific output from a specific input. Modularity and mass customization are making OT more like IT every day, but for now it's safe to say that OT systems are simpler, making mirosegmentation easier to initiate and operate.

As the number of potentially lethal anti-IIoT malware variants increases, we need to develop and install as many trigger monitors as possible. Separation of endpoint networks and micro-segmentation could be valuable security additions to the OT half of the world's industrial economy. 

Read Part Two: User Behavior Analytics Could Find a Home in the OT World of the IIo

Related Content:

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec. 3-6, 2018, with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Satish joined San Jose-based ABB in February 2017 as chief security officer and Group VP, architecture and analytics, ABB Ability™, responsible for the security of all products, services and cybersecurity services. Satish brings to this position a background in computer ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
New Mirai Version Targets Business IoT Devices
Dark Reading Staff 3/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Reading Schneier's Friday Squid Blog again?
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6149
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-18
An unquoted search path vulnerability was identified in Lenovo Dynamic Power Reduction Utility prior to version 2.2.2.0 that could allow a malicious user with local access to execute code with administrative privileges.
CVE-2018-15509
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-18
Five9 Agent Desktop Plus 10.0.70 has Incorrect Access Control (issue 2 of 2).
CVE-2018-20806
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-17
Phamm (aka PHP LDAP Virtual Hosting Manager) 0.6.8 allows XSS via the login page (the /public/main.php action parameter).
CVE-2019-5616
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-15
CircuitWerkes Sicon-8, a hardware device used for managing electrical devices, ships with a web-based front-end controller and implements an authentication mechanism in JavaScript that is run in the context of a user's web browser.
CVE-2018-17882
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-15
An Integer overflow vulnerability exists in the batchTransfer function of a smart contract implementation for CryptoBotsBattle (CBTB), an Ethereum token. This vulnerability could be used by an attacker to create an arbitrary amount of tokens for any user.