Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

1/17/2012
02:12 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Facebook: No Koobface Malware Attacks For Nearly A Year

An aggressive campaign by the social network to kill the pesky malware included taking down its command-and-control server; SophosLabs unmasks the alleged gang members

Facebook today revealed how over the past year it has been fighting the infamous Koobface malware that spreads via social networks and builds out a botnet: It knocked one of the gang’s command-and-control (C&C) servers offline, which resulted in more than nine months of no Koobface infections on the massive social network.

Security researchers worldwide have been putting the screws to the brazen Koobface malware gang of late in hopes of derailing their operations. Names have been named, their photos posted online, but they continue to operate freely in Russia. Sophos Labs, which today revealed a detailed account of how it followed the trail to the alleged gang members, also released the names of the alleged perpetrators: Anton Korotchenko, Alexander Koltyshev, Roman Koturbach, Syvatoslav Polinchuk, and Stanislav Avdeiko.

Koobface, which is an anagram for “Facebook,” had dogged the social network since 2008. The gang made money via pay-per-click and traffic referral schemes: Once a user got infected, his or her machine was redirected and, at times, duped into fake antivirus scams. The Koobface gang’s central C&C server was at the heart of the operation.

But Facebook today said that it killed that server back in March of last year: “...Facebook Security was able to perform a technical takedown of this ‘Command & Control’ Mothership. And since then we have had no new sightings of Koobface for over nine months and our teams are working hard to keep it that way,” according to post by Facebook’s security group today.

That takedown apparently came with the help of researchers including indie researcher Jan Droemer, who worked with SophosLabs’ Dirk Kollberg.

[Trend Micro report looks at the true motivation behind the widespread malware-laden botnet. See How The Koobface Worm Gang Makes Money.]

Facebook says it will share the information and intelligence it discovered about the game with others in the security industry. “Today, Koobface is still impacting other web properties and continues to threaten security for Internet users across the globe. While we have been able to keep Koobface off Facebook, we won't declare victory against the virus until its authors are brought to justice. We feel it is the interest of everyone online to work with law enforcement and the larger security community to identify the gang and see the full force of law brought to bear against those who have made millions in ill-gotten gains,” Facebook said today. “To this end, we will be sharing our intelligence with the rest of the online security community in the coming weeks in an effort to rid the Web of this virus forever.”

Koobface’s gang earns millions of dollars a year. But they made several missteps that led researchers to ID them, including a misconfigured server, and less-than-conspicuous personal online activity and luxurious lifestyles.

But whether they will be brought to justice is unclear.

"It's an incredible detective story of tireless investigation, which involved scouring the Internet, searching company records and taking advantage of schoolboy social networking errors made by the suspected criminals, their friends and family. We know the gang's names, their phone numbers, where their office is, what they look like, what cars they drive, even their mobile phone numbers," said Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos. "Now, we have to wait and see what, if any, action the authorities will take against the Koobface gang."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...