Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

1/24/2018
05:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

DDoS Attacks Become More Complex and Costly

Major DDoS attacks cost some organizations more than $100,000 in 2017, according to a new NETSCOUT Arbor report.

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks are more complex and cause more financial damage than ever, new data shows.

According to NETSCOUT Arbor's 2017 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report published today, the number of DDoS attacks that cost organization between $501 to $1,000 per minute in downtime increased by 60%. In addition, 10% of enterprises estimated a major DDoS attack cost them greater than $100,000 in 2017, five times more than previously seen.

Now in its 13th year, the report is based on 390 responses from service providers, hosting, mobile, enterprise, and other types of network operators from around the world. A full 66% of all respondents identify as security, network, or operations professionals.

Gary Sockrider, principal security technologist with NETSCOUT Arbor, says there was a 20% increase in multi-vector attacks in 2017 compared to the previous year. Multi-vector attacks combine high-volume floods, TCP state exhaustion attacks, and application-layer attacks in a single sustained offensive, which makes the attacks more difficult to mitigate and increases the attackers chance of success.

"We found that nearly half the group said they experienced a multi-vector attack," Sockrider says.

"Along with revenue loss, companies also experience customer and employee churn as well as reputational damage," he says.

DDoS attacks last year originated primarily from China, Russia, and inside the US, according to the report. The top motivators for the attacks were online gaming-related (50.5%), criminals demonstrating DDoS capabilities to potential customers (49.1%), and criminal extortion attempts (44.4%). Political/ideological disputes were fifth on the list at 34.5%.

Sockrider says due to the global shortage of IT security talent, many respondents were turning to automation  for DDoS mitigation: 36% of service providers use automation tools for DDoS mitigation, and 30% of providers employ on-premise or always-on cloud services for thwarting these attacks.

Meantime, researchers at Imperva researchers developed a list of the Top 12 DDoS Attack Types You Need to Know. Among them:

DNS Amplification: In a reflection type of attack, a perpetrator starts with small queries that use the spoofed IP address of the intended victim. Exploiting vulnerabilities on publicly-accessible DNS servers, the responses inflate into much larger UDP packet payloads and overwhelm the targeted servers.

UDP Flood: The perpetrator uses UDP datagram–containing IP packets to deluge random ports on a target network. The victimized system attempts to match each datagram with an application, but fails. The system soon becomes overwhelmed as it tries to handle the UDP packet reply volume.

DNS Flood: Similar to a UDP flood, this attack involves perpetrators using mass amounts of UDP packets to exhaust server-side resources. However, in this attack the target is DNS servers and their cache mechanisms, with the goal being to prevent the redirection of legitimate incoming requests to DNS zone resources.

Related Content:

 

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
US Mayors Commit to Just Saying No to Ransomware
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Now this is the worst micromanagment I've seen.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-17210
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-20
An issue was discovered in PrinterOn Central Print Services (CPS) through 4.1.4. The core components that create and launch a print job do not perform complete verification of the session cookie that is supplied to them. As a result, an attacker with guest/pseudo-guest level permissions can bypass t...
CVE-2019-12934
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-20
An issue was discovered in the wp-code-highlightjs plugin through 0.6.2 for WordPress. wp-admin/options-general.php?page=wp-code-highlight-js allows CSRF, as demonstrated by an XSS payload in the hljs_additional_css parameter.
CVE-2019-9229
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-20
An issue was discovered on AudioCodes Mediant 500L-MSBR, 500-MBSR, M800B-MSBR and 800C-MSBR devices with firmware versions F7.20A to F7.20A.251. An internal interface exposed to the link-local address 169.254.254.253 allows attackers in the local network to access multiple quagga VTYs. Attackers can...
CVE-2019-12815
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
An arbitrary file copy vulnerability in mod_copy in ProFTPD up to 1.3.5b allows for remote code execution and information disclosure without authentication, a related issue to CVE-2015-3306.
CVE-2019-13569
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Icegram Email Subscribers & Newsletters plugin through 4.1.7 for WordPress. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability would allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the affected system.