Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

3/25/2016
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Dangerous New USB Trojan Discovered

'USB Thief' could be used for targeted purposes, researchers at ESET say.

The Internet and the growing interconnectedness of networks have made it incredibly easy for threat actors to deliver and propagate malware. But not all cyber threats are Internet-borne.

Take USB Thief, new malware sample that researchers at security firm ESET recently discovered.  As its name implies, the malware is completely USB-borne, meaning it spreads exclusively through devices that plug into the USB port of computers.

This data-stealing Trojan could be used for targeted attacks on systems disconnected from the Internet. Some obvious examples of air-gapped systems that would fall into this category, and that would be of interest to the authors of USB Thief, would be industrial control systems controlling equipment at critical infrastructure facilities including power plants, nuclear facilities, shipyards, and elsewhere.

Based on the malware sample that ESET analyzed, the only way the malware would propagate is by the attacker installing it on other USB devices, says Bruce Burrell, a security researcher at ESET. "Users might be exposed by finding such sticks and inserting them into their computers."

The highly destructive Stuxnet worm that was used to degrade and destroy hundreds of centrifuges at Iran’s uranium enrichment facility at Natanz a few years ago was, in fact, initially introduced into the systems via an infected USB stick.

ESET did not disclose how it discovered USB Thief. But ESET describes it as very sophisticated, especially for its ability to avoid detection and reverse engineering.

The malware attaches as a plugin or a dynamically linked library (DLL) into the command chain of applications that are typically stored on USB devices, like Firefox, Notepad++, and TrueCrypt, ESET security researcher Tomas Gardon said in the blog post announcing the discovery.

Whenever these applications are executed, the malware runs in the background and steals data without giving users an inkling of what’s going on. Because it exists on a USB stick, the malware leaves no trace of its presence on any computer on which it runs. 

USB Thief’s real difference, though, lies in its self-protecting capabilities, according to Gardon. For starters, each malware sample is tied directly to the specific USB stick on which it is installed. A sample of USB Thief from one USB will not run if it is copied and pasted on another device.

That’s because of the way the authors have ensured that filenames would be different for every instance of USB Thief, Gardon said. Among other things, one of the filenames in the malware execution chain is linked to the file creation time, so any sample that is copied from an original would have a different file creation time and therefore would not work, the security researcher said.

In addition, some of the individual files in the malware are protected via AES128 encryption, where the encryption key is tied to the USB’s unique device ID and the particular disk properties of the device hosting the malware. As a result, the malware will only run on that specific device.

The file-naming techniques and encryption used in USB Thief make it extremely hard to disassemble and to study, Gardon said.

An analysis of USB Thief’s payload shows that it is designed to steal images, documents, and generally all data files on the system as well as the Windows registry tree, a complete list of files from all drives on the system. It then encrypts the stolen data.

The malware does not appear to be very widespread at the moment. But its payload can be easily changed so instead of data stealing it can be used for some other malicious purposes, Gardon said in his post.

 Related Content:

Interop 2016 Las VegasFind out more about security threats at Interop 2016, May 2-6, at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas. Click here for pricing information and to register.

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Jeremseo
50%
50%
Jeremseo,
User Rank: Strategist
4/5/2016 | 10:52:50 AM
USB User
For me I am still a big USB user... I feel it is an old habit, even on work we have clouds, still, USB is my first choice.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/29/2016 | 10:42:09 AM
No USB going forward?
I am also not how many of us are using USB sticks these days anymore. I was a heavy users for backups points of view but now I store everything in the cloud and I never need a USB drive on my devices. :--))

 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/29/2016 | 10:39:23 AM
Re: File Creation Timestamps
I agree. File attributes are not real indicators what is happening. They can easily be modified and dynamically changed on the fly.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/29/2016 | 10:37:48 AM
Re: Use HASHDEEP to detect the resulting stolen data
I assume there is always a way to see the trace if you analyze the USB drive itself. It is still playing a catch up tough. USB sticks are real danger to businesses.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/29/2016 | 10:35:41 AM
Re: interesting to know
This is actually not a new news, we have heard that USB device can easily be used to exploit vulnerabilities in the past. We all need to be cautious on that.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
3/29/2016 | 10:33:35 AM
USB port
 

USB port is a powerful way to access a secure network. When an employee finds a USB stick on the parking lot he/she feels lucky and wants to check what is in it. Super effective way of infecting computers and networks. May be it is time to block all USB ports :--))
theb0x
50%
50%
theb0x,
User Rank: Ninja
3/28/2016 | 1:38:18 PM
File Creation Timestamps
It is very easy to tamper with file timestamps. Creation time/date / modified..etc.

 
bpaddock
50%
50%
bpaddock,
User Rank: Strategist
3/28/2016 | 12:46:38 PM
Use HASHDEEP to detect the resulting stolen data
The program HashDeep has a negative audit mode that would show any additons to the USB stick.
The filename would not mater.  The article does not address where the stolen data file is stored at.
Is it always stored in the same place?

md5deep.sourceforge.net/start-hashdeep.html
batye
50%
50%
batye,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/25/2016 | 11:07:42 PM
interesting to know
interesting to know thank you 
Windows 10 Migration: Getting It Right
Kevin Alexandra, Principal Solutions Engineer at BeyondTrust,  5/15/2019
Artist Uses Malware in Installation
Dark Reading Staff 5/17/2019
Baltimore Ransomware Attack Takes Strange Twist
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12184
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-19
There is XSS in browser/components/MarkdownPreview.js in BoostIO Boostnote 0.11.15 via a label named flowchart, sequence, gallery, or chart, as demonstrated by a crafted SRC attribute of an IFRAME element, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-12136.
CVE-2019-12173
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-18
MacDown 0.7.1 (870) allows remote code execution via a file:\\\ URI, with a .app pathname, in the HREF attribute of an A element. This is different from CVE-2019-12138.
CVE-2019-12172
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Typora 0.9.9.21.1 (1913) allows arbitrary code execution via a modified file: URL syntax in the HREF attribute of an AREA element, as demonstrated by file:\\\ on macOS or Linux, or file://C| on Windows. This is different from CVE-2019-12137.
CVE-2019-12168
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Four-Faith Wireless Mobile Router F3x24 v1.0 devices allow remote code execution via the Command Shell (aka Administration > Commands) screen.
CVE-2019-12170
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
ATutor through 2.2.4 is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads via the mods/_core/backups/upload.php (aka backup) component. This may result in remote command execution. An attacker can use the instructor account to fully compromise the system using a crafted backup ZIP archive. This will allow for PH...