Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

2/15/2018
08:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cybercrime Gang Ramps up Ransomware Campaign

In the last few weeks, Gold Lowell group has collected over $350K after infecting victims with SamSam crypto malware, researchers at Secureworks found.

A cybercrime gang known as Gold Lowell has been using scan-and-exploit tactics to opportunistically infect business networks with ransomware and extort money from the victim organizations.

The group - which has been around since at least 2015 - appears to have ramped up activity in the last few weeks in keeping with its previous pattern of escalating attacks during the end part through the beginning of the calendar year, Secureworks said in a report this week.

Between late December and mid-January alone, Gold Lowell managed to collect at least $350,000 in extortion money after infecting victims with a custom version of SamSam, a previously known ransomware tool. The group's victims include healthcare organizations, IT software providers, transportation companies, waste management firms, and business services organizations. Many of them have been small- to midsized organizations.

From a malware perspective itself, SamSam is little different from the slew of ransomware tools floating about in the wild currently. The tactic Gold Lowell has been using to install the malware on victim systems and networks is notable, however, notes Matthew Webster, senior security researcher at Secureworks’ Counter Threat Unit.

"SamSam ransomware is essentially as sophisticated as it needs to be," Webster says. "The main contrast between other ransomware capabilities is how it is deployed—after compromise of the victim’s systems and account credentials."

According to Secureworks, Gold Lowell has shown a tendency to scan Internet-facing systems for known vulnerabilities and exploits. The group's scanning has targeted systems and protocols like JBoss and RDP that are more likely to be used by organizations than by individuals. Early on, the threat group regularly targeted JBoss applications using an open source exploitation tool. In 2017, Gold Lowell began targeting legitimate Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) account credentials—often via brute force attacks, Secureworks said.

Once it gains at initial foothold on a network, Gold Lowell has shown a tendency to use both publicly available and proprietary tools and exploits in order to escalate privileges and find the most central and critical systems to exploit.

"[SamSam's] encryption methodology is strong and it carries out actions that make it more difficult for recovery and investigation," Webster says. Measures include wiping additional space on the disk and deleting itself, he says.

Gold Lowell typically demands a ransom of around $9,500 for decrypting files. But based on how effective the group has been at deploying SamSam inside breached networks, it is quite likely that some victims are paying up a lot more, according to Webster. In one campaign during mid-2017 that Secureworks researchers observed, the value of the ransom for decrypting the entire network of the victim organization was 28 bitcoins, or approximately $68,000 at the time, he says.

In at least one instance the threat actors doubled the decryption cost after a victim's initial payment barely missed the deadline set for it. "The doubling of the ransom really goes to highlight that once the decision has been made to pay the ransom, then as victim you are handing control over to the adversary," Webster says. Such incidents highlight the importance for organizations to have a well-tested data backup and incident response process in place, he notes.

Gold Lowell, however, generally takes steps to instill confidence that the victim will get their data back once payment has been received. It offers to decrypt files as a test, for instance, and advice on purchasing bitcoin and how to set up bitcoin wallet.

"Long-term ransomware campaigns only work if the victim is confident that they will get their data back, and the SamSam actors clearly take steps to instill that confidence," Webster says.

Related Content:

 

 

Black Hat Asia returns to Singapore with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7068
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7069
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7070
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7071
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2019-7072
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .