Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

1/24/2019
11:45 AM
50%
50%

Cloud Customers Faced 681M Cyberattacks in 2018

The most common attacks involved software vulnerabilities, stolen credentials, Web applications, and IoT devices.

Cloud customers were hit with 681 million cyberattacks last year, according to analysts at cloud security provider Armor, which recently analyzed cloud attacks detected in 2018.

The most common cloud-focused threats leveraged known software vulnerabilities, involved brute-force and/or stolen credentials, targeted the Internet of Things (IoT), or aimed for Web applications with SQL injection, cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery attacks, or remote file inclusion. Researchers based the list on volume; these are not the most advanced or lethal cloud attacks.

Yet they continue to work, are easy to access, and are fairly simple to use, they explained in a blog post on their findings. Any cybercriminal can rent an exploit kit containing attack tools for a reasonable amount of cash. For example, they said, the older and established Disdain Exploit Kit was charging rental fees starting at $80 per day, $500 per week, and $1,400 per month. Kits are designed to be accessible to cybercriminals at all levels and are constantly updated with new exploits.

"Organizations that ignore patching leave themselves open to attacks that can take time and resources away from their business and can cause a lot of damage," said Corey Milligan, senior security researcher with Armor's Threat Resistance Unit (TRU).

TRU predicts IoT attacks, DDoS campaigns, targeted ransomware, advanced phishing campaigns, and attacks targeting containers and cloud services will be prevalent in 2019.

Read more details here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
1/30/2019 | 5:42:07 PM
Re: 691 M
Definitely agree, its always easier to qualify statistics if they are broken down into a regular trend, in this case by year.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
1/30/2019 | 5:40:35 PM
Re: Valuable Assessment
(Around known vulnerabilities) I agree that all known vulnerabilities need to be patched but prioritizing the criticals and severes over other moderate risk vulnerabilities may make mitigation more easily digestible, especially for organizations that are just starting to put together a program.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
1/30/2019 | 5:38:17 PM
Re: Valuable Assessment
About Equifax. If I recall correctly, they only had one individual responsible for patching which the executives tried to use as a scapegoat for the breach. I was baffled. But you'd be surprised how many organizations don't even have one person dedicated to patching. 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2019 | 6:39:42 PM
Re: Valuable Assessment
Unfortunately, too many companies continue under the methodology that they are not going to make changes until they are burnt by the stove. Agree. Most companies do not care until they get hit and of course they go out of business just after that.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2019 | 6:36:57 PM
Re: Valuable Assessment
definitely complements the logic of prioritizing patching Makes sense. Prioritization may not be enough, all the know vulnerabilities should be closed in a timely manner I would guess.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2019 | 6:34:20 PM
Re: Valuable Assessment
Equifax - case closed. Learn from a true master. Makes sense. We should try to apply all patches needed as a timely manner.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2019 | 6:31:39 PM
Re: Valuable Assessment
SANS has stated that 90% of risk can be mitigated through patching That makes sense and I would agree with it. Patching is critical.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
1/27/2019 | 6:30:40 PM
691 M
681 million cyberattacks last year, according to analysts at cloud security provider Armor, This does not give any how big the number is. It needs to be compared to previous years to make sense.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
1/24/2019 | 5:18:15 PM
Re: Valuable Assessment
Yup, definitely complements the logic of priorizing patching. I guess from "learning from a true master" it aligns with the premise of a smart man learns from their own mistakes but a brilliant man learns from others. Unfortunately, too many companies continue under the methodology that they are not going to make changes until they are burnt by the stove.
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
1/24/2019 | 3:08:20 PM
Re: Valuable Assessment
Equifax - case closed.  Learn from a true master.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 11/19/2020
New Proposed DNS Security Features Released
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/19/2020
The Yellow Brick Road to Risk Management
Andrew Lowe, Senior Information Security Consultant, TalaTek,  11/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: He hits the gong anytime he sees someone click on an email link.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29128
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
petl before 1.68, in some configurations, allows resolution of entities in an XML document.
CVE-2020-27251
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
A heap overflow vulnerability exists within FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send malicious port ranges, which could result in remote code execution.
CVE-2020-27253
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
A flaw exists in the Ingress/Egress checks routine of FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to specifically craft a malicious packet resulting in a denial-of-service condition on the device.
CVE-2020-27255
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
A heap overflow vulnerability exists within FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send malicious set attribute requests, which could result in the leaking of sensitive information. This information disclosure could lead to the b...
CVE-2020-25651
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
A flaw was found in the SPICE file transfer protocol. File data from the host system can end up in full or in parts in the client connection of an illegitimate local user in the VM system. Active file transfers from other users could also be interrupted, resulting in a denial of service. The highest...