Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

1/17/2008
07:45 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Attackers Use New 'Call-Home' Method to Infiltrate Home Networks

Honeynet Project researchers witness stealthy new method of botnet communication

Now the bad guys have discovered a way to set up a stealthy, continuous connection between the machines they infect and their own command and control servers.

Researchers with the Honeynet Project have been studying a new method being used by botnet operators and other cyber criminals that sets up what's called a "reverse tunnel proxy" connection -- a connection through the victim's Network Address Translation (NAT)-based filtering device such as a home router or other router or firewall.

What makes this approach different from traditional botnet relationships is that the command and control machine doesn't rely on the bot to "check in" and get its latest instructions, so it's more of a continuous connection, says Ralph Logan, a member of the board for the Honeypot Project and its chief public relations officer.

"The bot and the C&C don't need to maintain a connection for reconfiguration, 're-tooling,' or retasking," says Logan, who is also principal with The Logan Group. "They've created a new way to bypass any kind of routing device that gives you private IP addresses behind it."

The Honeynet Project, which will publish these findings next week in the latest in its series of "Know Your Enemy" white papers -- called "Know Your Enemy Lite: Proxy Threats - Socks v666" -- says the reverse tunnel proxy botnet is different from the classic IRC-based approach because it sets up dedicated proxies inside the victim's network from which controllers can initiate connection requests. A traditional bot initiates its connection via IRC, HTTP, or a peer-to-peer connection, waits for a command, and then follows the orders on behalf of the C&C machine.

Although home routers are the obvious mark, Logan says the technique could also be used against corporate networks as well.

An underlying weakness here is the common misperception that NAT protects users against direct attacks by assigning private and non-routable IP addresses that attackers can’t "see." And attackers are abusing these systems, which typically aren't properly secured, according to the researchers.

First the client machine gets infected by downloading a Trojan in an email attachment or by visiting a malicious Website. Then the attacker can have a connection "hiding in plain sight," according to the Honeynet Project report. And the proxy can also bypass IDS detection.

The Honeynet Project researchers say they have seen bad guys using this reverse tunnel proxy technique for relaying millions of spam messages worldwide, and that there's even an underground market for proxy abuse and collection. Another benefit for the bad guys: The bots could be mistakenly identified as the source of an attack.

Aside from spam, the reverse tunnel proxy is also being used for executing Web exploits and for targeted attacks, according to the Honeynet Project. The researchers say several criminal networks are currently using this technique. The report also includes mitigation strategies for network providers, including using security tools such as Snort, IPS, blacklisting, restricting outbound email, and adding various security policies.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Honeynet Project

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
    I 'Hacked' My Accounts Using My Mobile Number: Here's What I Learned
    Nicole Sette, Director in the Cyber Risk practice of Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps,  11/19/2019
    TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
    Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
    Ransomware Surge & Living-Off-the-Land Tactics Remain Big Threats
    Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  11/19/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
    In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
    Flash Poll
    Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
    Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
    Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2019-19013
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
    A CSRF vulnerability in Pagekit 1.0.17 allows an attacker to upload an arbitrary file by removing the CSRF token from a request.
    CVE-2019-3427
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
    The version V6.01.03.01 of ZTE ZXCDN IAMWEB product is impacted by a code injection vulnerability. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to inject malicious code into the management page, resulting in users� information leakage.
    CVE-2019-3428
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
    The version V6.01.03.01 of ZTE ZXCDN IAMWEB product is impacted by a configuration error vulnerability. An attacker could directly access the management portal in HTTP, resulting in users� information leakage.
    CVE-2019-4214
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
    IBM SmartCloud Analytics 1.3.1 through 1.3.5 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 159185.
    CVE-2019-4215
    PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
    IBM SmartCloud Analytics 1.3.1 through 1.3.5 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks ag...