Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

1/17/2008
07:45 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Attackers Use New 'Call-Home' Method to Infiltrate Home Networks

Honeynet Project researchers witness stealthy new method of botnet communication

Now the bad guys have discovered a way to set up a stealthy, continuous connection between the machines they infect and their own command and control servers.

Researchers with the Honeynet Project have been studying a new method being used by botnet operators and other cyber criminals that sets up what's called a "reverse tunnel proxy" connection -- a connection through the victim's Network Address Translation (NAT)-based filtering device such as a home router or other router or firewall.

What makes this approach different from traditional botnet relationships is that the command and control machine doesn't rely on the bot to "check in" and get its latest instructions, so it's more of a continuous connection, says Ralph Logan, a member of the board for the Honeypot Project and its chief public relations officer.

"The bot and the C&C don't need to maintain a connection for reconfiguration, 're-tooling,' or retasking," says Logan, who is also principal with The Logan Group. "They've created a new way to bypass any kind of routing device that gives you private IP addresses behind it."

The Honeynet Project, which will publish these findings next week in the latest in its series of "Know Your Enemy" white papers -- called "Know Your Enemy Lite: Proxy Threats - Socks v666" -- says the reverse tunnel proxy botnet is different from the classic IRC-based approach because it sets up dedicated proxies inside the victim's network from which controllers can initiate connection requests. A traditional bot initiates its connection via IRC, HTTP, or a peer-to-peer connection, waits for a command, and then follows the orders on behalf of the C&C machine.

Although home routers are the obvious mark, Logan says the technique could also be used against corporate networks as well.

An underlying weakness here is the common misperception that NAT protects users against direct attacks by assigning private and non-routable IP addresses that attackers can’t "see." And attackers are abusing these systems, which typically aren't properly secured, according to the researchers.

First the client machine gets infected by downloading a Trojan in an email attachment or by visiting a malicious Website. Then the attacker can have a connection "hiding in plain sight," according to the Honeynet Project report. And the proxy can also bypass IDS detection.

The Honeynet Project researchers say they have seen bad guys using this reverse tunnel proxy technique for relaying millions of spam messages worldwide, and that there's even an underground market for proxy abuse and collection. Another benefit for the bad guys: The bots could be mistakenly identified as the source of an attack.

Aside from spam, the reverse tunnel proxy is also being used for executing Web exploits and for targeted attacks, according to the Honeynet Project. The researchers say several criminal networks are currently using this technique. The report also includes mitigation strategies for network providers, including using security tools such as Snort, IPS, blacklisting, restricting outbound email, and adding various security policies.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Honeynet Project

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
    Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
    Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
    Tor Weaponized to Steal Bitcoin
    Dark Reading Staff 10/18/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
    This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
    Flash Poll
    2019 Online Malware and Threats
    2019 Online Malware and Threats
    As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2019-18218
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    cdf_read_property_info in cdf.c in file through 5.37 does not restrict the number of CDF_VECTOR elements, which allows a heap-based buffer overflow (4-byte out-of-bounds write).
    CVE-2019-18217
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    ProFTPD before 1.3.6b and 1.3.7rc before 1.3.7rc2 allows remote unauthenticated denial-of-service due to incorrect handling of overly long commands because main.c in a child process enters an infinite loop.
    CVE-2019-16862
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    Reflected XSS in interface/forms/eye_mag/view.php in OpenEMR 5.x before 5.0.2.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of a user's session via the pid parameter.
    CVE-2019-17409
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    Reflected XSS exists in interface/forms/eye_mag/view.php in OpenEMR 5.x before 5.0.2.1 ia the id parameter.
    CVE-2019-10715
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
    There is Stored XSS in Verodin Director before 3.5.4.0 via input fields of certain tooltips, and on the Tags, Sequences, and Actors pages.