theDocumentId => 1341542 Attackers Exploited 4 Zero-Day Flaws in Chrome, ...

Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

7/15/2021
06:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Attackers Exploited 4 Zero-Day Flaws in Chrome, Safari & IE

At least two government-backed actors -- including one Russian group -- used the now-patched flaws in separate campaigns, Google says.

The latest evidence of a troubling increase in zero-day exploit activity this year is three attack campaigns targeting four separate, previously unknown browser vulnerabilities that Google recently discovered and reported to the respective browser vendors.

Related Content:

How the Shady Zero-Day Sales Game Is Evolving

Special Report: Building the SOC of the Future

New From The Edge: Navigating Active Directory Security: Dangers and Defenses

Two of the exploits targeted flaws in Chrome, one targeted a vulnerability in Internet Explorer, and the fourth affected Safari. All four of the issues have been patched.

According to Google, a vendor of commercial surveillance software appears to have developed three of the exploits. At least two government-backed threat groups — one of them Russian — purchased those exploits and used them in attack campaigns before patches for the flaws became available.

"Halfway into 2021, there have been 33 zero-day exploits used in attacks that have been publicly disclosed this year," Google security researchers Maddie Stone and Clement Lecigne wrote in a blog post this week.

That number already is 11 more than the total number of zero-day exploits for all of last year. It reflects both the increased attacker interest in finding and exploiting such vulnerabilities and the greater success researchers are having in detecting and disclosing these issues, the researchers noted.

Google researchers discovered one of the two Chrome zero-days flaws (CVE-2021-21166) in February and the other (CVE-2021-30551) in June. Exploits for both these remotely executable flaws in the Chrome renderer were delivered as one-time links via email to targeted individuals, all of whom were in Armenia.

Recipients who clicked on the links were directed to a webpage that was designed to harvest system information and other data such as screen resolution, time zone, language, and browser plug-ins. The data was sent in an encrypted format to the attackers' controller server so the attackers could decide whether the system was worthy of further exploitation. The attack chain included an intermediate phase in which attacks collected other data, such as the CPU and OS version and CPU and BIOS information, Google said. Google's investigation of CVE-2021-21166 showed the same vulnerability existed in code shared with Apple's WebKit browser engine used in iOS.

A Russian threat actor — believed to be the same one behind the SolarWinds campaign — was observed delivering an exploit for the WebKit vulnerability (CVE-2021-1844) in a separate credential theft campaign targeting governments and nongovernmental organizations in Western Europe.

Meanwhile, the fourth zero-day vulnerability that Google discovered affected Internet Explorer (CVE-2021-33742). Researchers from the company discovered the flaw when investigating a campaign where malicious Office documents uploaded content within IE. That campaign, too, targeted users in Armenia and involved an exploit that was likely developed by the same commercial vendor that developed exploits for the Chrome zero-days, Google said. The exploits were designed to help enable surveillance of targeted entities.

Economics of Cybersecurity
Yaniv Bar-Dayan, CEO and co-founder at Vulcan Cyber, says zero-day attacks are increasing simply because they offer the path of least resistance for threat actors. "As IT security teams get better at protecting business from threat actors who exploit known vulnerabilities, these same actors are moving to sneak attack, or engineered, methods of hacking businesses," he says. "We are witnessing the economics of cybersecurity at play."

Google's Stone and Lecigne point to other factors as well. The growth of mobile platforms, for instance, has resulted in increased demand for exploits against mobile devices. Similarly, there has been an increase in the number of commercial vendors selling access to zero-day exploits, they said.

Another factor is the improved detection and reporting of zero-day threats. As an example, Stone and Lecigne pointed to changes that Google and Apple have made to highlight unpatched vulnerabilities that are being exploited in the wild even if the vendor has not disclosed it itself.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-23416
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
This affects all versions of package curly-bracket-parser. When used as a template library, it does not properly sanitize the user input.
CVE-2021-23417
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
All versions of package deepmergefn are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via deepMerge function.
CVE-2021-23415
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
This affects the package elFinder.AspNet before 1.1.1. The user-controlled file name is not properly sanitized before it is used to create a file system path.
CVE-2020-4974
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
IBM Jazz Foundation products are vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 192434.
CVE-2020-5004
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
IBM Jazz Foundation products are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 192957.