Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

2/11/2021
12:45 PM
Jai Vijayan
Jai Vijayan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail

7 Things We Know So Far About the SolarWinds Attacks

Two months after the news first broke, many questions remain about the sophisticated cyber-espionage campaign.
2 of 8

Initial Access Vector at SolarWinds Remains Unclear
The SolarWinds compromise involved attackers gaining access to the company's software development environment and inserting malicious code into builds for versions 2019.4 HF 5, 2020.2 unpatched, and 2020.2 HF 1 of the company's Orion network management platform. (The list of all affected products is here). The tainted builds were digitally signed and automatically pushed out to about 18,000 customers over a period of several months last year. Only a relatively small number of those organizations are believed to have been actually targeted for subsequent attacks.
The manner in which threat actors gained initial access to SolarWinds' build system environment remains unclear. A SolarWinds update on Feb. 3 described the company as still 'exploring several potential theories' about how the threat actors broke in. According to SolarWinds, current evidence suggests that the most likely attack vector was through a credential compromise and/or access through a then zero-day vulnerability in a third-party app.
SolarWinds has also confirmed that an email account belonging to one of its employees was compromised and used to 'programmatically access' accounts belonging to other targeted individuals. The attackers used the credentials to eventually gain access to SolarWinds' Orion development environment. The company says its data shows the attackers were in its network conducting reconnaissance for an unknown period of time before they began conducting trial runs of injecting malware into SolarWinds' build system in October 2019.
Image Source: PopTika via Shutterstock

Initial Access Vector at SolarWinds Remains Unclear

The SolarWinds compromise involved attackers gaining access to the company's software development environment and inserting malicious code into builds for versions 2019.4 HF 5, 2020.2 unpatched, and 2020.2 HF 1 of the company's Orion network management platform. (The list of all affected products is here). The tainted builds were digitally signed and automatically pushed out to about 18,000 customers over a period of several months last year. Only a relatively small number of those organizations are believed to have been actually targeted for subsequent attacks.

The manner in which threat actors gained initial access to SolarWinds' build system environment remains unclear. A SolarWinds update on Feb. 3 described the company as still "exploring several potential theories" about how the threat actors broke in. According to SolarWinds, current evidence suggests that the most likely attack vector was through a credential compromise and/or access through a then zero-day vulnerability in a third-party app.

SolarWinds has also confirmed that an email account belonging to one of its employees was compromised and used to "programmatically access" accounts belonging to other targeted individuals. The attackers used the credentials to eventually gain access to SolarWinds' Orion development environment. The company says its data shows the attackers were in its network conducting reconnaissance for an unknown period of time before they began conducting trial runs of injecting malware into SolarWinds' build system in October 2019.

Image Source: PopTika via Shutterstock

2 of 8
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2021-33034
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2019-25044
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.