Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

12/14/2007
06:14 AM
50%
50%

New Plug-ins Help Firefox Find XSS, SQL Injection

Powerful tools help identify vulnerabilities, but use them advisedly

4:14 PM -- Two new Firefox plug-ins were released last month to assist developers and security professionals in testing for cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection vulnerabilities.

Security Compass unveiled XSS-Me at SecTor in October, and publicly released it along with SQL Inject-Me in late November. The plug-ins make testing as simple as opening the sidebar, selecting which form of variables to test, and hitting the "execute" button. The plug-ins don't require configuration of proxy settings because they integrate directly into Firefox -- unlike other Web application security tools, such as Paros, Burp, and WebScarab.

Even though these tools are powerful and extremely easy to use, don’t be lulled into thinking your Website is secure because XSS-Me and SQL Inject-Me do not return any vulnerabilities. I tested several production and non-production Websites that were vulnerable to both classes of attacks, and while most results were as expected, there were a few discrepancies.

For example, on one of the test sites, there was an authentication bypass in the login screen where the string ‘) OR 1=1-- would allow me to log in without providing a correct password. Checking the SQL Inject-Me FAQ page verified that advanced attacks may require manual testing -- such as blind SQL injection attempting to bypass authentication.

Basic SQL injection causes obvious error messages stating that the Web page input caused an error with the SQL query against the backend database. For blind SQL injection, no obvious error messages are displayed, which makes it difficult to tell if an attack was successful or not.

If these tools won’t help with advanced attacks, what good are they? Think low-hanging fruit. Unless you’re the target of a malicious attacker looking to steal your data or take advantage of your users, it’s unlikely that attackers are going to find your site’s vulnerabilities -- unless a search engine inadvertently reveals your vulnerability. (See Google Hacking Database: Error Messages.) Or if you use a popular Web application that is vulnerable. Or if you get a friendly email from XSSed.com. (See 'You've Got Cross-Site Scripting'.)

By employing these tools during the development process, a lot of simple vulnerabilities can be eliminated, making the final audit quicker and easier. If you’re lucky, it might even instill a greater respect in your developers for secure coding practices.

– John H. Sawyer is a security geek on the IT Security Team at the University of Florida. He enjoys taking long war walks on the beach and riding pwnies. When he's not fighting flaming, malware-infested machines or performing autopsies on blitzed boxes, he can usually be found hanging with his family, bouncing a baby on one knee and balancing a laptop on the other. Special to Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/4/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
Cybersecurity Spending Hits 'Temporary Pause' Amid Pandemic
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13817
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
ntpd in ntp before 4.2.8p14 and 4.3.x before 4.3.100 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon exit or system time change) by predicting transmit timestamps for use in spoofed packets. The victim must be relying on unauthenticated IPv4 time sources. There must be an off-path attac...
CVE-2020-13818
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
In Zoho ManageEngine OpManager before 125144, when <cachestart> is used, directory traversal validation can be bypassed.
CVE-2020-6640
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
An improper neutralization of input vulnerability in the Admin Profile of FortiAnalyzer may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the Description Area.
CVE-2020-9292
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
An unquoted service path vulnerability in the FortiSIEM Windows Agent component may allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges via the AoWinAgt executable service path.
CVE-2019-16150
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
Use of a hard-coded cryptographic key to encrypt security sensitive data in local storage and configuration in FortiClient for Windows prior to 6.4.0 may allow an attacker with access to the local storage or the configuration backup file to decrypt the sensitive data via knowledge of the hard-coded ...