Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

7/8/2019
02:50 PM
50%
50%

NIST Sets Draft Guidelines for Government AI

This is the first formal step in writing the standards that will guide the implementation of AI technologies within the federal government.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has issued a draft guideline for developing artificial intelligence (AI) technical standards, the first major, formal step in writing the standards that will guide the procurement and implementation of AI and machine learning technologies within the federal government. And because many private organizations base their decisions on NIST documents, those standards could have repercussions that reach far beyond government purchasing.

Within the draft guideline are sections that deal with a wide variety of topics around AI, including how AI applications are developed, how AI is explained to stakeholders and the public, and how AI applications are used. Security plays a role in several aspects of the proposal, from how to build "trustworthy" AI applications to ensuring that AI's use takes both proper security and proper concern for privacy into account.

The NIST Guideline has been developed as part of the response to the American AI Initiative, established by executive order in February. Within five key areas of emphasis set out in the order, one called for NIST "to lead the development of appropriate technical standards for reliable, robust, trustworthy, secure, portable, and interoperable AI systems." Formal comments on the draft are being accepted through July 19.

For more, read here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
7/8/2019 | 4:03:03 PM
Setting standards
I agree that the way to get a handle on this AI initiative, we need to start now and work towards the planning aspects of AI, however, I don't agree with certain aspects of the document that may need to be reviewed:

 
Maximizing Use of the Voluntary Consensus Standards Process 302 Current and potential future Federal agency engagement in the development and use of 303 AI technical standards and related tools should meet agency requirements and support 304 the Nation's broader needs. OMB Circular A-119: Federal Participation in the 305 Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities21 306 , highlights several Federal government goals for participation 307 and use of voluntary standards: 308 "Many voluntary consensus standards are appropriate or adaptable for the Federal 309 government's purposes. The use of such standards, whenever practicable and 310 appropriate, is intended to achieve the following goals: 311 (i) eliminating the cost to the Federal government of developing its own 312 standards and decreasing the cost of goods procured and the burden of 313 complying with agency regulation; 314 (ii) providing incentives and opportunities to establish standards that serve 315 national needs, encouraging long-term growth for U.S. enterprises and 316 promoting efficiency, economic competition, and trade; and 317 (iii) furthering the reliance upon private sector expertise to supply the Federal 318 government with cost-efficient goods and services." 319 Other relevant statutes and policies include The National Technology Transfer and 320 Advancement Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-113, 1996) (NTTAA) and the World Trade 321 Organization Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement (WTO TBT). - NIST AI Standards

 Since the government is not in the business of developing standards for AI, I do think it is essential that we involve Academia (CONUS/OCONUS) and overseas organizations to help define and address a common set of standards (money should not be the limiting factor when we are focused on getting things right). It should be a consortium created to help with establishing the proper standards and protocols when it comes to rolling out AI, this is essential when it comes to attaching this free-thinking AI design to our national infrastructure.

Todd

 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
New 'Nanodegree' Program Provides Hands-On Cybersecurity Training
Nicole Ferraro, Contributing Writer,  8/3/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15820
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, the markdown parser could disclose hidden file existence.
CVE-2020-15821
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.6881, a user without permission is able to create an article draft.
CVE-2020-15823
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.2.8873 is vulnerable to SSRF in the Workflow component.
CVE-2020-15824
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains Kotlin before 1.4.0, there is a script-cache privilege escalation vulnerability due to kotlin-main-kts cached scripts in the system temp directory, which is shared by all users by default.
CVE-2020-15825
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-08
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.1, users with the Modify Group permission can elevate other users' privileges.