Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

2/21/2019
01:45 PM
50%
50%

New Free Tool Scans for Chrome Extension Safety

CRXcavator scans extensions in real time based on factors including permissions, external calls, and third-party libraries.

Chrome is, by far, the most widely used browser in the world. Its popularity is enhanced by the more than 180,000 add-ins, themes, apps, and extensions available for the browser. But are they safe to use? Now a new free tool from Duo Security can scan those extensions in real time to provide IT teams with assurance whether they are, indeed, safe for business users.

The CRXcavator scans a set of factors including permissions, external calls, third-party libraries, content security, and metadata to give security and IT staff insight into the safety of the browsers on their companies' computers. According to the blog post announcing the tool's availability, Duo researchers scanned 120,463 extensions and apps in January and found that many developers have used poor programming practices in their software. For example, 38,289 extensions " ... used third-party libraries that contain publicly known vulnerabilities," wrote the researchers.

Read more here.

 

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/21/2019 | 3:01:47 PM
Additional Commentary
Does Chrome being a browser created by Google have any oversight around extensions similar to the Google Play Store? Not to say the Play Store is overly safe. Or is it just a swamp of 3rd party add-ons running rampant?
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/21/2019 | 3:00:08 PM
Positive Step
I commend Duo for providing a free tool. Extensions are so widely accepted for function that without having a base to compare it makes it difficult to understand how hazardous extensions can be.
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
How a Manufacturing Firm Recovered from a Devastating Ransomware Attack
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5798
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Lack of correct bounds checking in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5799
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect inheritance of a new document's policy in Content Security Policy in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5800
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Insufficient policy enforcement in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5801
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect eliding of URLs in Omnibox in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5802
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect handling of download origins in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page.