Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

2/8/2021
12:45 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

NeuVector Releases Results of 2021 Container Security Survey

While enterprise DevOps say that security is a priority, they also report a lack of consensus over whose responsibility security is, how to enact it, and how to ensure it doesn't hamper CI/CD velocity.

SAN JOSE, Calif. – February 2, 2021 – NeuVector, the leader in Full Lifecycle Container Security, today announced the results of its 2021 Container Security Survey. The report, available for download here, identifies current trends and challenges enterprises are grappling with as they increasingly turn to microservices architectures.

NeuVector surveyed 156 enterprise DevOps professionals at the most recent KubeCon North America. Among respondents, 80% currently manage active container deployments and 87% are planning new container deployments over the next 6-12 months. Close to 90% of respondents utilize Kubernetes for container orchestration, and the majority name Jenkins their primary CI/CD pipeline automation tool (GitLab is second most-popular, with no other tool garnering more than 10%). When it comes to the role that security plays as more enterprises shift left to protect applications from the beginning of development, implement DevOps processes and cultures, and accelerate workflow productivity, 76% of respondents report that container security is a clear priority at their organization. However, questions over container security responsibilities within enterprises, how to balance security with performance, and how to respond to security incidents are far from settled.

2021 Container Security Survey Highlights

  • There is little consensus on who owns the responsibility for container security

Among respondents, 32% consider container security their organization’s single most important priority as they roll out containers and Kubernetes initiatives; another 44% report it as among their top priorities. That said, enterprises are mixed in how they are addressing security. In questions asking which team should be responsible for securing container environments and Kubernetes, respondents split their answers among security (42%), development (30%), and operations (28%) roles.

  • Nearly two-thirds of respondents would curtail security to maintain high CI/CD velocity

Somewhat contrary to respondents’ stated prioritization of security, 63% of respondents acknowledge that they would curtail or restrain security measures in order to maintain high velocity production. This risky proposition increases the potential that enterprises will face repercussions from known and unknown vulnerabilities. On a positive note, 61% of respondents do use Kubernetes Pod security and/or network security policies, and many supplement those native policies with vulnerability scanning, along with network inspection and blocking.

  • Security incident response functions used in Kubernetes environments are all over the map

To protect critical applications and data when incidents do occur, enterprises are leveraging a broad range of tools and strategies. While Layer 7 network blocking leads the way as a tactic employed by 32% of respondents, nearly as many have adopted Layer 3 and 4 network blocking, network packet capture, container process blocking, file access monitoring, or container quarantining.

  • Additional findings

Interestingly, DevOps respondents indicated a crucial need for information as they deploy Kubernetes and pursue container security measures. Two-thirds report relying on official Kubernetes documentation as their best source of information, while 41% leverage information from Kubernetes security vendors, and 39% turn to documentation from cloud vendors.

“As container security breaches continue to make headlines, we are pleased that a majority of enterprises leveraging containerized environments name security among their highest priorities,” said Fei Huang, Chief Strategy Officer at NeuVector. “At the same time, that fact that a disproportionate number of enterprises would sacrifice security for productivity is both troubling and misguided. We advise organizations to recognize security as essential to the success of their container and Kubernetes implementations, and to select security capabilities that can enable development agility while still achieving fully reliable protection.”

The full report can be accessed here: https://go.neuvector.com/2021securitysurvey

About NeuVector

NeuVector, the leader in Full Lifecycle Container Security, delivers uncompromising end-to-end security for modern container infrastructures. NeuVector offers a cloud-native Kubernetes security platform with end-to-end vulnerability management, automated CI/CD pipeline security, and complete run-time security – including the industry’s only container firewall to block zero-day attacks and other threats. NeuVector customers include global leaders in financial services, healthcare, transportation, government and other industries. For customers in highly regulated industries, NeuVector simplifies compliance for PCI, GDPR, HIPAA, and other stringent data security mandates. NeuVector integrates with leading cloud platforms, CI/CD tools, and monitoring tools. Founded by industry veterans from Fortinet, VMware, and Trend Micro, NeuVector has developed patented behavioral learning for container security.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-29623
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
Exiv2 is a C++ library and a command-line utility to read, write, delete and modify Exif, IPTC, XMP and ICC image metadata. A read of uninitialized memory was found in Exiv2 versions v0.27.3 and earlier. Exiv2 is a command-line utility and C++ library for reading, writing, deleting, and modifying th...
CVE-2021-32917
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
An issue was discovered in Prosody before 0.11.9. The proxy65 component allows open access by default, even if neither of the users has an XMPP account on the local server, allowing unrestricted use of the server's bandwidth.
CVE-2021-32918
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
An issue was discovered in Prosody before 0.11.9. Default settings are susceptible to remote unauthenticated denial-of-service (DoS) attacks via memory exhaustion when running under Lua 5.2 or Lua 5.3.
CVE-2021-32919
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
An issue was discovered in Prosody before 0.11.9. The undocumented dialback_without_dialback option in mod_dialback enables an experimental feature for server-to-server authentication. It does not correctly authenticate remote server certificates, allowing a remote server to impersonate another serv...
CVE-2021-32920
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
Prosody before 0.11.9 allows Uncontrolled CPU Consumption via a flood of SSL/TLS renegotiation requests.