Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

1/6/2020
05:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Malicious Google Play Apps Linked to SideWinder APT

The active attack involving three malicious Android applications is the first exploiting CVE-2019-2215, Trend Micro researchers report.

Researchers have discovered an attack exploiting CVE-2019-2215, which leverages three malicious apps in the Google Play store to compromise a target device and collect users' data.

This threat is linked to the SideWinder advanced persistent threat (APT) group, report Trend Micro's Ecular Xu and Joseph Chen in a blog post. Sidewinder, a group detected by Kaspersky Labs in the first quarter of 2018, primarily targets Pakistani military infrastructure and has been active since at least 2012. Security researchers believe the threat group is associated with Indian espionage interests and has a history of targeting both Windows and Android devices.

CVE-2019-2215 was disclosed in October 2019 by Maddie Stone of Google's Project Zero. The zero-day local privilege escalation vulnerability affected hundreds of millions of Android phones at the time it was published. A patch was released in December 2017 for earlier Android versions; however, new source code review indicated newer versions of the software were vulnerable.

The use-after-free vulnerability is considered "high severity" and requires a target to download a malicious application for potential exploitation. An attacker would have to chain CVE-2019-2215 with another exploit to remotely infect and control a device via the browser or another attack vector. The bug allows for a "full compromise" of a vulnerable device, Stone explained.

While it was "highly likely" the bug was being used in attacks last October, this marks the first known active campaign using it in the wild, Xu and Chen report. This particular vulnerability exists in Binder, the main interprocess communication system that exists in Android, and the three malicious apps used in the attack were disguised as photography and file manager tools.

Android apps Camero, FileCrypt Manager, and callCam are believed to be related to the SideWinder group and have been active on Google Play since March 2019, based on one of the apps' certificate information. All have since been removed from the Play store.

CallCam is the payload app and is installed in two stages, the researchers explain. First a DEX file — an Android file format — is downloaded from the command-and-control server. The downloaded DEX file downloads an APK file and installs it after exploiting the device or employing accessibility. Camero and FileCrypt Manager both act as droppers. After downloading the DEX file from the C2 server, they call extra code to download, install, and launch the callCam app.

Researchers note the C2 servers used are suspected to be part of SideWinder's infrastructure. Further, a URL linking to one of the apps' Google Play pages is on one of the C2 servers.

SideWinder relies on device rooting as one of its tactics to deploy callCam without alerting the victim. The malware retrieves a specific exploit from the C2 server depending on the DEX the dropper downloads. This approach only works on Google Pixel (Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL), Nokia 3 (TA-1032), LG V20 (LG-H990), Oppo F0 (CPH1881), and Redmi 6A devices.

Over the course of its investigation, Trend Micro was able to download five exploits from the C2 server and found they used CVE-2019-2215 and MediaTek-SU to gain root privileges. Once they achieve this, the malware installs callCam, enables accessibility permissions, and launches.

Another approach is using the accessibility permission, a technique used by the FileCrypt Manager on Android phones running Android 1.6 or higher. After launch, FileCrypt asks the user to enable accessibility. When granted, this displays a full-screen overlay that says it requires further setup. In the background, the app is calling code from the DEX file so it can download more apps and install callCam. It enables the accessibility permission and launches the payload.

"All of this happens behind the overlay screen, unbeknownst to the user," Xu and Chen write.

After launch, the callCam icon is hidden on the target device and collects data in the background to send to the C2 server. This information includes location, battery status, files stored on the device, list of installed apps, account data, Wi-Fi data, and information related to the device, sensor, and camera. It also pulls data from WeChat, Outlook, Twitter, Yahoo Mail, Facebook, Gmail, and Chrome. CallCam encrypts all of this stolen data using RSA and AES encryption, and uses SHA256 to verify the data's integrity and customize the encoding routine.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "What Tools Will Find Misconfigurations in My AWS S3 Cloud Buckets?"

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/23/2020
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
Russian Military Officers Unmasked, Indicted for High-Profile Cyberattack Campaigns
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-24847
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability is identified in FruityWifi through 2.4. Due to a lack of CSRF protection in page_config_adv.php, an unauthenticated attacker can lure the victim to visit his website by social engineering or another attack vector. Due to this issue, an unauthenticat...
CVE-2020-24848
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
FruityWifi through 2.4 has an unsafe Sudo configuration [(ALL : ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL]. This allows an attacker to perform a system-level (root) local privilege escalation, allowing an attacker to gain complete persistent access to the local system.
CVE-2020-5990
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
NVIDIA GeForce Experience, all versions prior to 3.20.5.70, contains a vulnerability in the ShadowPlay component which may lead to local privilege escalation, code execution, denial of service or information disclosure.
CVE-2020-25483
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
An arbitrary command execution vulnerability exists in the fopen() function of file writes of UCMS v1.4.8, where an attacker can gain access to the server.
CVE-2020-5977
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-23
NVIDIA GeForce Experience, all versions prior to 3.20.5.70, contains a vulnerability in NVIDIA Web Helper NodeJS Web Server in which an uncontrolled search path is used to load a node module, which may lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, and information disclosure.