Government officials' seeming inability to manage information has led me to conclude they don't need a backup and archiving policy so much as they need a virtual Roto-Rooter turned on their servers and tape drives and cardboard boxes. And here are three cases in point.

2 Min Read

Government officials' seeming inability to manage information has led me to conclude they don't need a backup and archiving policy so much as they need a virtual Roto-Rooter turned on their servers and tape drives and cardboard boxes. And here are three cases in point.Sometime between now and Friday, the White House will have to tell a judge why it is the Bush administration shouldn't restore what may be as many as 5 million lost e-mails. Barring any sort of delay or request for continuance, I'm betting they plead one of two arguments: that such restoration wouldn't be in the public interest, or that executive privilege extends to the mail server that couldn't.

U.S. District Court Judge John Facciola said the White House must "show ... why it should not be ordered to create and preserve a forensic copy of any media that has been used or is being used by any former or current employee who was employed at any time between March 2003 and October 2005." He gave them three days to respond in writing.

It's a bit disconcerting how long these things can drag on. In a perverse bit of political timing, the Clinton Library in Little Rock, Ark., began releasing archived information today on the daily schedule kept by former first lady and presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The National Archives is releasing 11,046 pages, according to this account. More than 4,700 pages have parts blacked out, mostly to protect the privacy of third parties, including their Social Security numbers, phone numbers, and home addresses.

And it's pretty safe to say these wouldn't be seeing the light of day if not for the dogfight that the New York senator is in for the Democratic presidential nomination. Judicial Watch had sued for their release as well.

Last we come to the backlog of Freedom of Information Act requests. Despite an executive order from President Bush in December 2005, the number of unanswered requests dropped only 2% in the next two years, from 217,000 to 212,000. An audit of the backlog by George Washington University said the order "lacked both carrot and stick." No punishment, no reward, no movement at all.

Speakers at next-gen Internet conferences for the last 10 years have bloviated that content is king. I don't think this bureaucratic stonewalling is what they had in mind with that comment, but it applies here. It's ironic and possibly even criminal in this age of access and free flow of ideas that information can be so difficult to nail down. Content's quickly dethroned when those who generated the content have the keys to the archive.

About the Author(s)

Terry Sweeney, Contributing Editor

Terry Sweeney is a Los Angeles-based writer and editor who has covered technology, networking, and security for more than 20 years. He was part of the team that started Dark Reading and has been a contributor to The Washington Post, Crain's New York Business, Red Herring, Network World, InformationWeek and Mobile Sports Report.

In addition to information security, Sweeney has written extensively about cloud computing, wireless technologies, storage networking, and analytics. After watching successive waves of technological advancement, he still prefers to chronicle the actual application of these breakthroughs by businesses and public sector organizations.


Keep up with the latest cybersecurity threats, newly discovered vulnerabilities, data breach information, and emerging trends. Delivered daily or weekly right to your email inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights