Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

11/5/2019
10:00 AM
Rui Ribeiro
Rui Ribeiro
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Enterprise Web Security: Risky Business

Web development is at much more risk than commonly perceived. As attackers eye the enterprise, third-party code provides an easy way in.

The technologies used to create products for the Web have evolved rapidly in recent years. JavaScript, the predominant language of the Web, is present today in 97% of modern websites. More interestingly, every Fortune 500 company uses JavaScript — specifically, npm, the JavaScript package ecosystem built by millions of developers globally.

After Node.js environment was released in 2009, the JavaScript open source community really came to life, creating pieces of reusable code (usually called modules or packages) that could be shared by different projects. As this ecosystem evolved, we saw the emergence of full-featured front-end libraries and frameworks that greatly increased development speed. Not only for creating web apps, but also for mobile and desktop apps, all relying on modern JavaScript.

For companies, this meant an unmissable opportunity — by relying on peer-reviewed third-party modules, it became less needed to develop every piece of code in-house. In such a fast-paced industry, cutting product development time and cost directly translated to a competitive edge. Code reuse became the status quo of web development in the enterprise.

As specific product needs were met with specific community-built modules, the number of third-party modules of web apps (also known as code dependencies) quickly built up — today, averaging 1,000 dependencies per web app. And here, we must address security risk.

Each of these third-party modules represents a security liability. Companies have no control over this code but blindly trust their providers to keep it secure. However, most of these providers are individual developers who often don’t have stringent security in place and so may pose little challenge to seasoned attackers. After gaining control of one of these modules, attackers can then inject malicious code downstream in the web supply chain, breaching multiple companies in a single go. This malicious code then acts silently, siphoning valuable data such as credit card details or protected health information. [Editor's note: Jscrambler is one of a number of companies that sell services that address this issue.]

Recent findings by researchers from the Technical University of Darmstadt point out that this risk is much higher than commonly thought. Each of these third-party modules that companies amass by the hundreds contains, on average, 80 dependencies of its own. Considering these vast ramifications, Darmstadt researchers reached a startling conclusion: If 20 high-profile developer accounts are compromised by attackers, half of the ecosystem is breached. We’re talking about giant corporations worldwide being attacked from within their own code.

And while this same research urges npm stakeholders to put in place stricter code vetting and vulnerability analysis, the enterprise can’t afford to wait while still leaving it all to blind trust. Management must have a say on this, raising the right questions on third-party code security. Especially when considering that, in 2018, Web-based attacks cost companies $2.3 million on average, with the figure being $1.4 million for attacks achieved with malicious code.

It’s granted that third-party code isn’t going anywhere, as it’s still one of the main drivers of competitive product development. But it’s in learning to integrate externally sourced code securely that the enterprise will gradually mitigate this risk. Development and security teams must critically contemplate each piece of external code as a gateway for attacks. This means reducing dependencies whenever possible, gaining visibility of malicious code, and auditing code frequently and thoroughly.

Companies are still finding out about the devastating potential of these attacks in retrospect — when it’s too late. It’s time that enterprise gave this business liability proper attention — trusting third-party code responsibly, while actively keeping an eye out for web supply chain attacks.

Related Content:

 

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "How HR and IT Can Partner to Improve Cybersecurity."

CEO and Co-Founder of Jscrambler, Rui Ribeiro has led the company since 2007 from bootstrapping to a growing business. Currently, he executes the company's growth strategy and manages its vision and culture. With over 15 years of experience in the information technology ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/5/2020
How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
Cybersecurity Spending Hits 'Temporary Pause' Amid Pandemic
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13864
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
The Elementor Page Builder plugin before 2.9.9 for WordPress suffers from a stored XSS vulnerability. An author user can create posts that result in a stored XSS by using a crafted payload in custom links.
CVE-2020-13865
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
The Elementor Page Builder plugin before 2.9.9 for WordPress suffers from multiple stored XSS vulnerabilities. An author user can create posts that result in stored XSS vulnerabilities, by using a crafted link in the custom URL or by applying custom attributes.
CVE-2020-11696
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
In Combodo iTop a menu shortcut name can be exploited with a stored XSS payload. This is fixed in all iTop packages (community, essential, professional) in version 2.7.0 and iTop essential and iTop professional in version 2.6.4.
CVE-2020-11697
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
In Combodo iTop, dashboard ids can be exploited with a reflective XSS payload. This is fixed in all iTop packages (community, essential, professional) for version 2.7.0 and in iTop essential and iTop professional packages for version 2.6.4.
CVE-2020-13646
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
In the cheetah free wifi 5.1 driver file liebaonat.sys, local users are allowed to cause a denial of service (BSOD) or other unknown impact due to failure to verify the value of a specific IOCTL.