Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

10/29/2015
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Security Analytics Still Greenfield Opportunity

Surveys out this week show improvement in the use of analytics and threat intelligence but room for better execution.

Stats from two new reports this week show that enterprises are getting better at analyzing security data across their organizations. But there’s room for improvement in how they use analytics to anticipate and respond to security incidents. In particular, cybersecurity teams struggle to marry up their expectations with their execution and deployment of the technology.

Today, SANS Institute leaked out details from a new survey it expects to release in full next month. Among the high points is the fact that organizations are slowly getting better at leveraging security analytics and threat intelligence.

Approximately two-thirds of organizations say they’ve gotten their mean time to detect security events down to a week or under, compared with just half of organizations last year. Plus, the ratio of organizations who can’t identify how to measure normal behavior has shrunk from about one-third down to a quarter of organizations.

Overall, about 83 percent of organizations report improving visibility into events and breaches.

“Detection and response times are improving, and many teams feel like they are building more effective security event management and intelligence programs with analytics capabilities," says Dave Shackleford, SANS analyst and author of the upcoming report.

Nevertheless, the true inflection point for security analytics is still a long way off given some additional data points provided in a Ponemon Institute survey released yesterday. The study, sponsored by Prelert, showed that even though two-thirds of security specialists believe automated security analytics is crucial for network defense, only a third of them have actually deployed analytics technology to support that.

Additionally, less than 10 percent of organizations report that they are effective in detecting or prioritizing advanced threats. Of those companies that have deployed analytics technology, about half take days or longer to communicate that information to incident response teams.

What’s more, 60 percent say that five or more security breaches were not stopped in the past two years due to insufficient or outdated threat intelligence.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Windows 10 Migration: Getting It Right
Kevin Alexandra, Principal Solutions Engineer at BeyondTrust,  5/15/2019
Baltimore Ransomware Attack Takes Strange Twist
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/14/2019
When Older Windows Systems Won't Die
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/17/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12184
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-19
There is XSS in browser/components/MarkdownPreview.js in BoostIO Boostnote 0.11.15 via a label named flowchart, sequence, gallery, or chart, as demonstrated by a crafted SRC attribute of an IFRAME element, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-12136.
CVE-2019-12173
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-18
MacDown 0.7.1 (870) allows remote code execution via a file:\\\ URI, with a .app pathname, in the HREF attribute of an A element. This is different from CVE-2019-12138.
CVE-2019-12172
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Typora 0.9.9.21.1 (1913) allows arbitrary code execution via a modified file: URL syntax in the HREF attribute of an AREA element, as demonstrated by file:\\\ on macOS or Linux, or file://C| on Windows. This is different from CVE-2019-12137.
CVE-2019-12168
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Four-Faith Wireless Mobile Router F3x24 v1.0 devices allow remote code execution via the Command Shell (aka Administration > Commands) screen.
CVE-2019-12170
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
ATutor through 2.2.4 is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads via the mods/_core/backups/upload.php (aka backup) component. This may result in remote command execution. An attacker can use the instructor account to fully compromise the system using a crafted backup ZIP archive. This will allow for PH...