Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

6/18/2018
11:10 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

7 Ways Cybercriminals Are Scamming a Fortune from Cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies, how do hackers love thee? Let us count the ways.
Previous
1 of 8
Next

Image Source: Adobe Stock (mehaniq41)

Image Source: Adobe Stock (mehaniq41)

With the cryptocurrency market bonanza in full swing, unscrupulous cybercriminals are cooking up new scams and hacks by the hour, all with the goal of reaping the ill-gotten rewards from investors, cryptocurrency exchanges, and legitimate coin miners across the internet.

According to most experts, 2018 is reaching a fevered pitch of criminal activity around all things blockchain and cryptocoin. In fact, one estimate by CryptoAware states that the criminal activity only halfway through 2018 makes up more than half of all criminal cryptocurrency incidents in the past seven years. So far this year, losses are stacking up to nearly $1.7B in publicly disclosed losses, according to figures compiled by that company.

Some cybersecurity experts believe the feeding frenzy is so frantic that it’s potentially distracting the bad guys from more traditional forms of cybercriminal data theft. For example, according to Risk Based Security's Q1 2018 Data Breach Trends report, this year's first quarter was the quietest in six years. Its researchers offer several theories on why, and one of them has to do with crypto criminality.

"We think the shift toward cryptomining is possibly easing some of the attention on data theft," says Inga Goddijn, executive vice president for Risk Based Security. "It's still too early to say for sure, but it does go to show: Malicious activity will follow the best opportunities for making a profit."

The following are some of the most common ways that the crooks are hacking and scamming their way into riches off the cryptocurrency bubble.

 

Top industry experts will offer a range of information and insight on who the bad guys are – and why they might be targeting your enterprise. Click for more information

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 8
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
Fed Kaspersky Ban Made Permanent by New Rules
Dark Reading Staff 9/11/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16395
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
GnuCOBOL 2.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow in the cb_name() function in cobc/tree.c via crafted COBOL source code.
CVE-2019-16396
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
GnuCOBOL 2.2 has a use-after-free in the end_scope_of_program_name() function in cobc/parser.y via crafted COBOL source code.
CVE-2019-16199
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
eQ-3 Homematic CCU2 before 2.47.18 and CCU3 before 3.47.18 allow Remote Code Execution by unauthenticated attackers with access to the web interface via an HTTP POST request to certain URLs related to the ReGa core process.
CVE-2019-16391
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
SPIP before 3.1.11 and 3.2 before 3.2.5 allows authenticated visitors to modify any published content and execute other modifications in the database. This is related to ecrire/inc/meta.php and ecrire/inc/securiser_action.php.
CVE-2019-16392
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
SPIP before 3.1.11 and 3.2 before 3.2.5 allows prive/formulaires/login.php XSS via error messages.