Android devices, tablets, and jailbroken devices top list of riskiest mobile products in the enterprise setting.
10 Companies Driving Mobile Security
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
As mobile devices continue to become more sophisticated and more integral to employees' everyday work lives, these mini computers in our pockets and handbags continue to become bigger and bigger threats to IT security.
"The proliferation of the devices is happening so fast, and people are now pushing the limits on what they're using the devices for, that IT is having a hard time keeping up," says Dave Hansen, CEO of Numara Software.
So many devices are big risks because critical information runs freely through them and security procedures are ignored for the sake of expediency--these are tools built for convenience, after all. Most troubling, it is often the executive suite that champions fewer security controls so they can continue to use these mobile tools without fetters. That leads to an almost willful ignorance from IT, who would rather not butt heads with senior management.
"It's bizarre. I was a CIO for a Fortune 500 company, and I remember five years ago when I was the one that put passwords on BlackBerrys and thought they were going to burn effigies of me in the lobby," Hansen says. "There was yelling and debating going on at the executive level as to why we would to that."
But ignorance gets us nowhere. In order to mitigate the risks, IT first needs to identify them. The following three devices are some of the biggest security threats to your infrastructure, whether you know it or not.
Devices running on Android OS are increasingly becoming a favorite among hackers for two big reasons: market share and openness.
As the number of Android devices has proliferated in the market, it becomes an ideal medium for attackers to look for common vulnerabilities and quickly spread malware.
Published: 2015-10-15 The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...
Published: 2015-10-15 Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.
Published: 2015-10-15 Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.
Join Dark Reading community editor Marilyn Cohodas and her guest, David Shearer, (ISC)2 Chief Executive Officer, as they discuss issues that keep IT security professionals up at night, including results from the recent 2016 Black Hat Attendee Survey.