Vulnerabilities / Threats
3/5/2009
05:52 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft Patch Day Won't Fix Excel Vulnerability

The vulnerability that Microsoft warned about just over a week ago affects files that use the old .xls binary format but not the newer .xlsx format.

Microsoft on Thursday said it plans to issue three Security Bulletins next Tuesday, March 10, one of which is designated "critical" and the other two of which are designated "important."

Conspicuously absent is a fix for the Excel security flaw that Microsoft warned about just over a week ago.

Microsoft provided very little information about the patches it will issue other than stating that the flaws affect Windows. The "critical" vulnerability allows remote code execution, while the two "important" vulnerabilities allow spoofing.

The affected versions of Windows include Windows Vista, Windows XP, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2003, and Windows Server 2000.

Microsoft typically issues its patches around 10 a.m. Pacific time on the second Tuesday of the month, a day often referred to by Windows IT administrators as "Patch Tuesday." On the following day, the company plans to host a Webcast at 11 a.m. Pacific time to answer customer questions about the bulletins.

It was Symantec researchers in Japan who first detected the malware being embedded in Microsoft Office Excel 2007 spreadsheets, according to Symantec researcher Patrick Fitzgerald.

After analyzing the files, the researchers found that the malware authors were exploiting a vulnerability in Excel that allowed them to execute malicious files on the victim's system. The vulnerability affects files that use the old .xls binary format but not the newer .xlsx format.

Microsoft said it expects to release a fix for the Excel vulnerability once the patch has been tested. It notes that the vulnerability cannot be exploited automatically through e-mail. The victim has to first open the infected Excel file.


Take part in InformationWeek's fourth annual NAC enterprise security strategy survey before March 5 and be eligible to win an iPod Touch. Find out more.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: You should see what I wear on my work from home days!
Current Issue
The Changing Face of Identity Management
Mobility and cloud services are altering the concept of user identity. Here are some ways to keep up.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.