Vulnerabilities / Threats
10/20/2010
10:55 AM
50%
50%

Malware Winning Battle Against Antivirus Software

Security apps' threat-stopping ability declined 6% over the past year as threats gained sophistication, finds NSS Labs.

Strategic Security Survey: Global Threat, Local Pain
Strategic Security Survey: Global Threat, Local Pain
(click image for larger view and for full slideshow)
In antivirus we trust, but is that trust warranted?

That's one question raised by a new study from NSS Labs, tested 11 consumer antivirus products from top developers -- AVG, ESET, F-Secure, McAfee, Microsoft, Norman, Panda, Symantec, Sunbelt, and Trend Micro.

The NSS methodology was simple: apply the same exploits and malware used by attackers, then see how many antivirus products, running on a PC with Microsoft Windows 7, can block it. In particular, researchers said they studied malware downloaded from websites on the Internet through social engineering tricks as well as client-side exploits against applications, including Internet Explorer, Firefox, QuickTime, and Adobe Acrobat, among other drive-by attacks.

The test results weren't reassuring. "Consumers are facing a dizzying array of threats that are not completely addressed by even the best performing products," said NSS Labs. Furthermore, antivirus efficacy is declining, with the average product performing 6% worse against current malware in 2010 than in 2009. In other words, attackers are gaining the edge on exploits that antivirus can't catch.

"Cybercriminals have between a 10% to 45% chance of getting past your AV with web malware," said NSS Labs. Furthermore, "cybercriminals have between 25% to 97% chance of compromising your machine using exploits." That variation depends on which product consumers use -- assuming, of course, that they're using any antivirus at all.

Unfortunately, products that are outstanding at stopping one threat may stumble when faced with another. "Trend Micro offers the best protection against web malware, and excellent performance -- i.e. minimal impact," according to the report. "However, its lack of exploit protection is a considerable impediment."

Furthermore, while McAfee and F-Secure offer good malware protection, the tradeoff is a performance hit. Even so, "in our opinion, the performance impact is far outweighed by the security imperative, and users should prioritize security over performance."

Can these findings be extrapolated to the business realm? Not necessarily. "In most cases we found considerable differences between a vendor's corporate product and their consumer version," said NSS Labs. "It is not safe to assume the results are identical."

Even so, the performance of consumer products leaves cause for concern. For example, Norton Internet Security 2010 from Symantec -- the world's largest antivirus developer -- stopped 72% of malware and 64% of exploits. But what about the 28% of malware and 36% of exploits it didn't stop? For attackers, getting just one piece of malicious code through the defenses can be enough.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Five Things Every Business Executive Should Know About Cybersecurity
Don't get lost in security's technical minutiae - a clearer picture of what's at stake can help align business imperatives with technology execution.
Flash Poll
Dark Reading Strategic Security Report: The Impact of Enterprise Data Breaches
Dark Reading Strategic Security Report: The Impact of Enterprise Data Breaches
Social engineering, ransomware, and other sophisticated exploits are leading to new IT security compromises every day. Dark Reading's 2016 Strategic Security Survey polled 300 IT and security professionals to get information on breach incidents, the fallout they caused, and how recent events are shaping preparations for inevitable attacks in the coming year. Download this report to get a look at data from the survey and to find out what a breach might mean for your organization.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Security researchers are finding that there's a growing market for the vulnerabilities they discover and persistent conundrum as to the right way to disclose them. Dark Reading editors will speak to experts -- Veracode CTO and co-founder Chris Wysopal and HackerOne co-founder and CTO Alex Rice -- about bug bounties and the expanding market for zero-day security vulnerabilities.