Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/27/2016
10:30 AM
Dan Cuddeford
Dan Cuddeford
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

The Internet Of Tiny Things: What Lurks Inside

Hackers can now use a tiny $2 embedded chip -- at scale -- to launch thousands of infected 'things' out into the ether to capture data and soften consumers up for an attack.

Imagine this: you’re handed a free phone charger at a tech conference and you accept it, knowing that your phone battery isn’t likely to survive the day. Little do you know that a tiny device is embedded within the charger, capturing data and softening you up for an eventual attack.

Sound like an unlikely threat? Think again.

Between the many stories of hacked refrigerators, automobiles, medical devices, webcams, baby monitors and more, the dangers of the Internet of things (IoT) has been thrust into the spotlight. However, not much consideration has gone into IoT devices being utilized to attack legacy IT devices.

With the IoT economy expected to be worth $1.7 trillion by 2020, according to IDC, the cost and form factor of IoT devices is dropping exponentially while the computing power approaches that of what can be achieved with a “non-thing” device. Believe it or not, with these technology advancements, hackers can now use a tiny $2 IoT chip at scale for malicious purposes - launching thousands of infected-things out into the ether. Because the size of these chips is so small, they can be easily inserted into USB chargers and memory sticks and piggyback off the power supply they are a part of.

Black Hat USA returns to the fabulous Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada July 30 through Aug. 4, 2016. Click for information on the conference schedule and to register.

Victims and carriers of these devices might be unaware that such small things can harbor such risks, exposing both individuals and organizations to considerable threat of cyberattack.

An example of this is an IoT chip called the ESP-01 8266, which is a low cost Wi-Fi chip with full TCP/IP stack and an embedded microcontroller. Roughly the size of a quarter, this chip is available for less than two dollars per unit, weighs less than five grams, and comes in over twelve form factors varying in physical size. These same chips are often used for embedded devices such as temperature sensors or controllers placed on lightweight drones. 

The largest form factor is the ESP-12E chip, which can be used to demonstrate how both active and passive WiFi attacks can be conducted using a cheap and self-contained device like a phone charger. Passive attacks listen for unencrypted WiFi communication, which the majority of public hotspots are configured for. Active attacks, on the other hand, may spoof a well-known service set identifier (SSID) and attempt to socially engineer a user to install a bad profile on their mobile device or cryptographically intercept sensitive information such as email traffic.

These passive and active exploits have even been conducted on a much smaller scale with the ESP-01 chip, a device so small it can fit inside a mobile phone charger. This charger can covertly act as the chip’s power source and whenever the victim plugs their charger into a power source, the chip is activated. The chip seeks out open WiFi networks, and if available, calls-home for the next over-the-air (OTA) update. There are many nefarious applications the chip can run including serving malicious profiles to nearby devices. It can also passively monitor neary SSIDs/BSSIDs to approximate the charger’s current location and transmit that back to the hacker. (Click here for more on this project.)

So with all this in mind, what’s on the horizon for the ESP8266 form factor?

The current family of ESPs are small and cheap but underpowered for any complex cryptographic function. However, as technology advances, the chip will continue to evolve. In fact, the new ESP32 adds additional computing power and the ability to use Bluetooth and WiFi simultaneously. This may lead to seeing the ESP chip-set being used for more active attacks and man-in-the-middle spoofing. So the next time you’re at a conference and you’re handed a free charger, you may want to think twice about what might be lurking inside.

Related Content:

 

 

Dan is director of sales engineering at Wandera, the leading global provider of security and management for mobile data. An experienced engineer in network and cloud security, Dan has worked with start-ups through to global enterprises. Organizations use Wandera to protect ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
lorraine89
50%
50%
lorraine89,
User Rank: Ninja
9/16/2016 | 10:16:13 AM
Staying safe online
The internet is not a safe haven anymmore. The threat of being hacked lingers around us on daily basis. I myself have been the victim of counterfeiting last year via email scam. Since then I have been using vpn server, purevpn, to secure and hide my IP from being the recipient of unwanted scam emails and most importantly to shield my home network from being traced or hacked, particularly when I am carrying out banking transactions. 
'Hidden Tunnels' Help Hackers Launch Financial Services Attacks
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/20/2018
Inside a SamSam Ransomware Attack
Ajit Sancheti, CEO and Co-Founder, Preempt,  6/20/2018
Tesla Employee Steals, Sabotages Company Data
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  6/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-12697
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
A NULL pointer dereference (aka SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000000) was discovered in work_stuff_copy_to_from in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.30. This can occur during execution of objdump.
CVE-2018-12698
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
demangle_template in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.30, allows attackers to trigger excessive memory consumption (aka OOM) during the "Create an array for saving the template argument values" XNEWVEC call. This can occur during execution of objdump.
CVE-2018-12699
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
finish_stab in stabs.c in GNU Binutils 2.30 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact, as demonstrated by an out-of-bounds write of 8 bytes. This can occur during execution of objdump.
CVE-2018-12700
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
A Stack Exhaustion issue was discovered in debug_write_type in debug.c in GNU Binutils 2.30 because of DEBUG_KIND_INDIRECT infinite recursion.
CVE-2018-11560
PUBLISHED: 2018-06-23
The webService binary on Insteon HD IP Camera White 2864-222 devices has a stack-based Buffer Overflow leading to Control-Flow Hijacking via a crafted usr key, as demonstrated by a long remoteIp parameter to cgi-bin/CGIProxy.fcgi on port 34100.