Vulnerabilities / Threats

12/21/2015
05:00 PM
50%
50%

Oracle Settles FTC Charges That It Deceived Users About Java Security Updates

Oracle will have to be more forthright and communicate the truth via social media and anti-virus companies going forward.

Oracle has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it had deceived customers. Oracle told customers that by installing an update to JavaSE it would make their machines "safe and secure," despite the fact that the update often left vulnerable versions of JavaSE on the users' machines.

The update only replaced the most recent version of JavaSE residing on the machine -- it stopped short of uninstalling any other versions also residing on the computer, and did not uninstall any versions earlier than JavaSe 6 update 10 at all. According to the FTC, Oracle knew of this shortcoming in 2011 and did not fix it until August of 2014.

Under the terms of the proposed consent order, according to the FTC release:

Oracle will be required to notify consumers during the Java SE update process if they have outdated versions of the software on their computer, notify them of the risk of having the older software, and give them the option to uninstall it. In addition, the company will be required to provide broad notice to consumers via social media and their website about the settlement and how consumers can remove older versions of the software.

The consent order will require Oracle to notify consumers on Facebook and Twitter, and also contact Avast Software, AVG Technologies, ESET North America, Avira Inc., McAfee, Symantec, Trend Micro, and Mozilla, to ensure they publish the information in their security bulletins as well.

 

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
12/22/2015 | 8:55:57 AM
Big Issue
Have they changed Java's install procedure to include an uninstall of previous versions? I thought this was not incorporated yet in case multiple versions of Java were required for different apps.


Until Java mandates the uninstall of older versions there will always be this security hole.
White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
The Fundamental Flaw in Security Awareness Programs
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  7/19/2018
Number of Retailers Impacted by Breaches Doubles
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer, Dark Reading,  7/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14505
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-22
mitmweb in mitmproxy v4.0.3 allows DNS Rebinding attacks, related to tools/web/app.py.
CVE-2018-14500
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-22
joyplus-cms 1.6.0 has XSS via the manager/collect/collect_vod_zhuiju.php keyword parameter.
CVE-2018-14501
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-22
manager/admin_ajax.php in joyplus-cms 1.6.0 has SQL Injection, as demonstrated by crafted POST data beginning with an "m_id=1 AND SLEEP(5)" substring.
CVE-2018-14492
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-21
Tenda AC7 through V15.03.06.44_CN, AC9 through V15.03.05.19(6318)_CN, and AC10 through V15.03.06.23_CN devices have a Stack-based Buffer Overflow via a long limitSpeed or limitSpeedup parameter to an unspecified /goform URI.
CVE-2018-3770
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
A path traversal exists in markdown-pdf version <9.0.0 that allows a user to insert a malicious html code that can result in reading the local files.