Vulnerabilities / Threats
5/22/2014
11:40 AM
50%
50%

Flaws In EMV Chip And PIN Undercut Security

Weaknesses in the EMV protocol and implementations create vulnerabilities that could be exploited via POS malware and man-in-the-middle attacks.

10 Ways To Fight Digital Theft & Fraud
10 Ways To Fight Digital Theft & Fraud
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

More than one year after receiving warnings from security researchers that there are serious flaws in the EMV protocol used to authenticate credit and debit card transactions in 80 countries around the world, card issuers and ATM manufacturers have failed to patch all related flaws.

Cambridge University computer security researchers sounded that warning this week in a presentation at the IEEE Symposium on Privacy and Security in San Jose, Calif., in which they detailed two major problems with the EuroPay, MasterCard, and Visa (EMV) standard now used to secure more than 1.6 billion cards worldwide.

The researchers said they began exploring EMV security, often referred to as chip and PIN -- "in layman's terms, the chip protects against card counterfeiting, and the PIN against stolen card abuse," they explained in a related research paper -- after British bank HSBC refused to refund a series of transactions to a customer based in Malta named Mr. Gambin. During related disputed-transaction negotiations, HSBC shared detailed ATM log data with Gambin, which included the date, time, as well as an "unpredictable number" (UN), or "nonce," generated by the ATM to validate the transactions.

[Are you an eBay user? Change your password now. Read 7 Facts: eBay Fumbles Password Reset Warning.]

Reviewing the unpredictable number, however, the researchers found that it was, in fact, often predictable. "Some EMV implementers have merely used counters, timestamps or home-grown algorithms to supply this nonce," they said. "This exposes them to a 'pre-play' attack, which is indistinguishable from card cloning from the standpoint of the logs available to the card-issuing bank, and [which] can be carried out even if it is impossible to clone a card physically."

In some cases, obtaining a legitimate ATM nonce on which to base an attack would also be easy. According to the researchers, for example, the UN is printed on all receipts generated in Italy.

Digging further, the researchers also spotted a deeper flaw in the protocol that attackers could use to compromise transactions, even when an ATM generated a cryptographically strong random number. That flaw is due to the ability of attackers to intercept the unpredictable number via a man-in-the-middle attack and replace it with a different pre-computed one, which would likely pass muster with the authorizing bank. Such an attack could be executed via malware installed on POS devices, even if those devices include tamper-resistant EMV modules.

A Visa spokesman did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment about the researchers' findings.

To date, some of the random-number-generator flaws spotted by the researchers have now been patched. But the EMV alliance has yet to address the deeper flaw in the protocol itself. "The banks appear to have ignored this, perhaps reasoning that it is difficult to scale up an attack that involves access to specific physical cards and also the installation of malware or wiretaps on specific terminals," the researchers said. "We disagree. The Target compromise shows that criminals can deploy malware on merchant terminals widely and exploit it to earn serious money."

The researchers added that they know of at least one "likely case" of a related skimming attack in the wild, and warned that "the spread of ATM and POS malware is making it ever more of a threat."

In the wake of the Target breach, which occurred after attackers managed to sneak malware

Next Page

Mathew Schwartz served as the InformationWeek information security reporter from 2010 until mid-2014. View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
DNS Threats: What Every Enterprise Should Know
Domain Name System exploits could put your data at risk. Here's some advice on how to avoid them.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.