Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/19/2017
08:00 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'AVPass' Sneaks Malware Past Android Antivirus Apps

Researchers at Black Hat USA will release a toolset that studies and then cheats specific Android AV apps.

A team of researchers from Georgia Tech built an Android hacking tool that snuck past nearly all of 58 Android AV antivirus programs in tests conducted via VirusTotal.

Their AVPass toolkit includes a query function that vets and probes an Android AV program's detection capabilities, a malware variant generator that generates multiple variations of a sample, and a data analyzer that analyzes the findings and uses that information to ultimately bypass AV apps on a mobile device.

The researchers plan to release the toolkit at Black Hat USA in Las Vegas next week during their AVPass: Leaking and Bypassing Antivirus Detection Model Automatically session there.

"AVPass is meant to make sure whatever malware you're sending cannot be screened by antivirus," says Max Wolotsky, a PhD student and researcher with Georgia Tech. "The entire goal of AVPass is if you scan malware on either VirusTotal or another AV program" it can't be identified, he says.

Wolotsky and his fellow researchers from Georgia Tech - Chanil Jeon, research associate; Insu Yun, PhD student; Jinho Jung; PhD student; and Taesoo Kim, and assistant professor - say their technique also could work on other platforms, and they plan to test it against Windows desktop machines.

The Python-based AVPass roots out the internal detection methods and code logic of the AV systems information it then uses to cheat the AV system.

Of the dozens of popular and lesser-known AV programs on the free VirusTotal online scanning site, only AhnLab and WhiteArmour's AV programs stopped AVPass in its tracks most of the time, the researchers say.

"We can't say for sure that we can bypass the other 56 AVs 100% of the time; however, in our tests we were almost always able to do so," Wolotsky says. On average, AVPass-generated apps were detected by AV only six percent of the time, he says.

The researchers also learned a few things about Android AV programs in their project: for one thing, the more complex an AV program's detection rules, the stronger its ability to catch malware.

Wolotsky says AV apps can defend against an AVPass-type attack by classifying AVPass as malicious. Android AV app vendors, meanwhile, can rate-limit their AV tools and generate "null" responses so the attack can't glean any intel about the AV program's capabilities.

AVPass sends a series of phony malware variants to test the AV's functions in snippets so as not to release the entire malware sample during the recon phase. With the intel in hand, it then alters the malware. "We found that most AVs commonly use a fixed number of detection rules," Wolotsky says. "For instance, a weak AV can be bypassed only after one feature obfuscation."

The Bigger Picture
The AVPass project is actually just one of multiple research initiatives at Georgia Tech on vulnerabilities in machine learning algorithms. These projects are studying how malicious attackers could manipulate machine learning algorithms and compromise or disrupt security analytics, search engines, customized news feeds, facial and voice recognition, and fraud detection, for example.

Wolotsky and his team's work on AVPass began with exploring how antivirus tools classify malware, and they used VirusTotal to determine what machine-learning techniques the AV programs employ. Their ultimate goal with the project is to find ways for these AV programs to stop malware in its tracks.

AVPass is basically a proof-of-concept tool mainly aimed at developers, both app and AV, that can be used to study ways to detect variations of malware. The Georgia Tech researchers plan to conduct a live demonstration during their Black Hat talk, in which they will submit a piece of their malware to VirusTotal to show how AVPass can be used to determine how to bypass AV systems.

Related Content:

Black Hat USA returns to the fabulous Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada, July 22-27, 2017. Click for information on the conference schedule and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
LisaB845
50%
50%
LisaB845,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/20/2017 | 8:01:36 AM
re:3d intro maker
is this true, i dont believe it?
tutuapp_sahil
50%
50%
tutuapp_sahil,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/20/2017 | 5:53:56 AM
permission
When you install any application from it, the specific application requires your personal data, which means that you need to take a look at their terms and conditions. Otherwise the application is safe.
WebAuthn, FIDO2 Infuse Browsers, Platforms with Strong Authentication
John Fontana, Standards & Identity Analyst, Yubico,  9/19/2018
NSS Labs Files Antitrust Suit Against Symantec, CrowdStrike, ESET, AMTSO
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/19/2018
Turn the NIST Cybersecurity Framework into Reality: 5 Steps
Mukul Kumar & Anupam Sahai, CISO & VP of Cyber Practice and VP Product Management, Cavirin Systems,  9/20/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Are you sure this is how we get our data into the cloud?
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-8298
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-24
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the login page in RXTEC RXAdmin UPDATE 06 / 2012 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) loginpassword, (2) loginusername, (3) zusatzlicher, or (4) groupid parameter to index.htm, or the (5) rxtec cookie to index.htm.
CVE-2018-14825
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-24
A skilled attacker with advanced knowledge of the target system could exploit this vulnerability by creating an application that would successfully bind to the service and gain elevated system privileges. This could enable the attacker to obtain access to keystrokes, passwords, personal identifiable...
CVE-2018-17437
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-24
Memory leak in the H5O_dtype_decode_helper() function in H5Odtype.c in the HDF HDF5 through 1.10.3 library allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted HDF5 file.
CVE-2018-17438
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-24
A SIGFPE signal is raised in the function H5D__select_io() of H5Dselect.c in the HDF HDF5 through 1.10.3 library during an attempted parse of a crafted HDF file, because of incorrect protection against division by zero. It could allow a remote denial of service attack.
CVE-2018-17439
PUBLISHED: 2018-09-24
An issue was discovered in the HDF HDF5 1.10.3 library. There is a stack-based buffer overflow in the function H5S_extent_get_dims() in H5S.c. Specifically, this issue occurs while converting an HDF5 file to a GIF file.