Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/6/2017
02:40 PM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

7 Ways Hackers Target Your Employees

One employee under reconnaissance by cyberattackers can put your whole business at risk. Where are they being targeted, and what should they know?
Previous
1 of 8
Next

(Image: Bluebay via Shutterstock)

(Image: Bluebay via Shutterstock)

Cybercriminals are testing the strength of your organization's defensive wall, looking for the one crack they need to launch their attacks. Oftentimes that flaw isn't a "what," but a "who."

Employees only need to download a bad attachment, click a malicious link, or give attackers one piece of information they need to break in. Security is a business-wide responsibility.

"Companies need to realize if their employees are picking up the phone and answering emails, they are making security decisions every day that can affect the company," says Michele Fincher, COO for Social-Engineer, Inc. "They don't realize how many good decisions employees need to make to be secure."

Addressing the importance of security during annual training sessions isn't enough, says Fincher. "If you only talk about it once a year, you're doing the staff a grave disservice."

Social engineering attacks also make it harder to differentiate legitimate from malicious activity. In the past, cybercriminals needed more technical skills to launch attacks. These days, they can wreak havoc with social network browsing, phone calls, and emails. They can conduct surveillance without raising red flags.

As Social-Engineer, Inc. CEO Chris Hadnagy explains, "There's no bar for entry for an attacker."

Here are seven common strategies attackers use to target employees. Share these with your teams to inform them of today's dangers and where hackers may be hiding.

 

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 8
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
zaltter
50%
50%
zaltter,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/10/2017 | 3:30:30 AM
Website
Problem with linkedin is, we really need it... this is a total open door for hakers...
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/7/2017 | 8:37:59 AM
"LinkedIn is one of the biggest sources of wealth for the bad guys,"
At SecureWorld Philadelphia, it was demonstrated that LinkedIn will typically catalog the individuals organization and software packages they are familiar with. This type of recon allows for the attacker to hone down the amount of exploits he or she will need to review when crafting a phishing attack.
What We Talk About When We Talk About Risk
Jack Jones, Chairman, FAIR Institute,  7/11/2018
Major International Airport System Access Sold for $10 on Dark Web
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/11/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14379
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-18
MP4Atom::factory in mp4atom.cpp in MP4v2 2.0.0 incorrectly uses the MP4ItemAtom data type in a certain case where MP4DataAtom is required, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted MP4 file, because access t...
CVE-2018-14373
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-17
An issue was discovered in LibTIFF 4.0.9. In TIFFFindField in tif_dirinfo.c, the structure tif is being dereferenced without first checking that the structure is not empty and has the requested fields (tif_foundfield). In the call sequences following from the affected library functions (TIFFVGetFiel...
CVE-2018-14374
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-17
An issue was discovered in LibTIFF 4.0.9. A buffer overflow can occur via an empty fmt argument to unixErrorHandler in tif_unix.c, and it can be exploited (at a minimum) via the following high-level library API functions: TIFFClientOpen, TIFFFdOpen, TIFFRawStripSize, TIFFCheckTile, TIFFComputeStrip,...
CVE-2018-14375
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-17
An issue was discovered in LibTIFF 4.0.9. A buffer overflow vulnerability can occur via an invalid or empty tif argument to TIFFRGBAImageOK in tif_getimage.c, and it can be exploited (at a minimum) via the following high-level library API functions: TIFFReadRGBAImage, TIFFRGBAImageOK, and TIFFRGBAIm...
CVE-2018-14378
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-17
An issue was discovered in LibTIFF 4.0.9. A buffer overflow can occur via an invalid or empty tif argument to TIFFWriteBufferSetup in tif_write.c, and it can be exploited (at a minimum) via the following high-level library API function: TIFFWriteTile.