Perimeter

Guest Blog // Selected Security Content Provided By Sophos
What's This?
5/8/2009
06:04 PM
Graham Cluley
Graham Cluley
Security Insights
50%
50%

Spammers Deluge Inboxes With Mother's Day Offers

I never thought I would be thanking spammers for anything -- but they're the ones who reminded me about Mother's Day.

I never thought I would be thanking spammers for anything -- but they're the ones who reminded me about Mother's Day.If it weren't for them bombarding me with email about last-minute flowers, chocolates, baskets of fruit, and, ahem -- look away now, I can't believe even the spammers would think this was a suitable Mother's Day present -- vibrators, I might not have realized what Sunday represented.

Mother's Day spam

And, actually, that's the problem. Although Mother's Day in the U.S. is on May 10, different countries in the world celebrate their mothers on different days.

For instance, as a Brit I celebrate Mother's Day (or as it's known in Old Blighty, Mothering Sunday) on the fourth Sunday in Lent. That was March 22. And you can stop holding your breath if you're an Argentinian mum; you won't be having your special day until the third Sunday of October.

With more than 20 possible dates for Mother's Day in different parts of the world, cybercriminals have plenty of opportunities to send spam or malicious email posing as greeting cards.

So while mothers may appreciate their children being reminded by spam to do something special, buying goods advertised in this way encourages spammers to send more junk email. On the flip side, if no one purchased the products sold via spam, then I reckon many of the spammers would disappear.

It's time to boycott the companies who use spam to sell their goods. If you receive an unsolicited commercial email, don't try, don't buy, don't reply.

Graham Cluley is senior technology consultant at Sophos, and has been working in the computer security field since the early 1990s. When he's not updating his other blog on the Sophos Website, then you can find him on Twitter at @gcluley. Special to Dark Reading.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Government Shutdown Brings Certificate Lapse Woes
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  1/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-6443
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
An issue was discovered in NTPsec before 1.1.3. Because of a bug in ctl_getitem, there is a stack-based buffer over-read in read_sysvars in ntp_control.c in ntpd.
CVE-2019-6444
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
An issue was discovered in NTPsec before 1.1.3. process_control() in ntp_control.c has a stack-based buffer over-read because attacker-controlled data is dereferenced by ntohl() in ntpd.
CVE-2019-6445
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
An issue was discovered in NTPsec before 1.1.3. An authenticated attacker can cause a NULL pointer dereference and ntpd crash in ntp_control.c, related to ctl_getitem.
CVE-2019-6446
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
An issue was discovered in NumPy 1.16.0 and earlier. It uses the pickle Python module unsafely, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized object, as demonstrated by a numpy.load call.
CVE-2019-6442
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-16
An issue was discovered in NTPsec before 1.1.3. An authenticated attacker can write one byte out of bounds in ntpd via a malformed config request, related to config_remotely in ntp_config.c, yyparse in ntp_parser.tab.c, and yyerror in ntp_parser.y.