Analytics
4/5/2007
09:53 AM
50%
50%

Solving IPTV's Security Problem

Vendors wrestle to protect emerging services from attacks - without driving cost-conscious customers away

If you've been wondering why service providers aren't rolling out IPTV services faster, then you're not thinking like a security pro. The answers are, in order: security and security.

Until recently, the fledgling services have been faced with two major problems: how to protect the copyrights of television content and how to affordably protect the IP networks that carry the signal from external attacks. But experts now say the first problem is under control, and there are emerging technologies that could solve the second.

The first hurdle is essentially a digital rights management issue: How can the service provider restrict access of IPTV content only to paying customers, and how can it restrict the customer's ability to copy and distribute copyrighted content?

In the past year, however, several vendors have attacked that problem. One such vendor is Helius, which now offers MediaLock, a system that encrypts signal transmission between the service provider's content delivery systems and the customer's set-top box. The encryption ensures that only the paying customer can receive and descramble the IPTV content -- and cannot send it to anyone else.

More recently, however, prospective IPTV providers have been struggling to find ways to secure their networks against possible hacks, such as denial-of-service attacks that were perpetrated last year on voice-over-IP services.

The problem, in a nutshell, is that IPTV services generally depend on a broad network of servers and encoders to deliver content to each customer, according to Gary Southwell, director of IPTV technology at Juniper Networks, which has been studying the problem for more than two years. Many of the servers, such as those that deliver video on demand, cannot be "locked down" because they must interact with the customer.

"We could protect them with firewalls, but IPTV is delivered at stream sizes of up to 4 Mbit/s, and most firewalls can't sustain traffic at levels that high," Southwell says. "The only way to do it would be to put a firewall at each server or encoder, and even if we could solve the performance problem, it would have forced the service provider to increase its average data center budget by a factor of four."

The high cost of securing the IPTV network has essentially broken the service's business model, Southwell observes. "The tier-1 types won't roll out a service without being able to secure the infrastructure, and the tier 2s have tried rolling out services without the security, and then found that they couldn't do without it."

A DOS attack on an IPTV network might not completely prevent the delivery of the content, but it could slow it down significantly, Southwell says. For example, a Microsoft server that handles channel switching might be overwhelmed, leaving thousands of chair-bound channel-surfers clicking their remotes with slow or no effect.

To help eliminate that problem, Juniper has adapted its Integrated Security Gateway to work with Microsoft's IPTV servers, essentially providing a secure buffer between the client system -- typically a PC or set-top box -- and the server that delivers the content.

"If the ISG detects an unusual number of channel requests, it can simply hold those requests for a second or two, and that will prevent the server from busying out." The ISG also can detect the source of the DOS attack and take suspected problem users off the network, he says.

The IPTV-capable ISG product also can support traffic from as many as 100 servers, lowering the cost of deploying security capabilities significantly, Southwell says.

With the DRM problem largely solved and an infrastructure protection solution on the horizon, it won't be long before users start to see IPTV services launched, Southwell says. "There's still work to do as customers begin to use more PCs and PDAs for these services, but a lot of the security obstacles are being overcome."

— Tim Wilson, Site Editor, Dark Reading

  • Helius Inc.
  • Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR) Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    RichardB125
    50%
    50%
    RichardB125,
    User Rank: Apprentice
    6/9/2017 | 9:33:58 PM
    Denial of Service attacks
    In reading this article, I have to concurr that security is and must be paramount.

    I started to experience these problems at home more than a year ago. One of my sons got a Roku box and later NVidia media shield.

    Many times we had been attacked and cut of the internet services only when using any of these two boxes. Started with a massive DoS that somehow poisoned the CAM table of the managed switch. As we do not have any VLANS or separate network for Roku or NVidia boxes, it ended up corrupting and cutting of the internet services as the exit gateway on any PC at home ends in 0.0.0.0 instead of the right one. It also poisons the DNS cache of the home router.

    After that I put in service a Cisco ASA 5506x- Firepower and things turned more difficult for them.

    Two weeks ago I took the Cisco ASA out and put a Fortinet 30E but forgot to enable the DoS policy, hence, last night we lost the internet again but now the policy is in place, as well as IPS (Intrusion Prevention System). Needeles to say this weekend, the NVidia shield will end in its own Vlan and VDOM (as fortigate callst it) and in a new managed switch with ARP protection as well.

    Well, not many home users will have the knowkedge and capacity to put this toghether but let me tell you that 99% oh those "royuters" at home would not last 10 seconds. Even some of the "commercial" grades one like D Link D 520 that I had to put in the rubbish bin.

    Yes, agree, there is a gigantic problem..............I can even see the security logs of the Fortigate 30E with the HTTP injection coming in...............quite an incredible and "invisible to the human eyes" problem.
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    Dark Reading Live EVENTS
    INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
    A Dark Reading Conference
    While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: No, no, no! Have a Unix CRON do the pop-up reminders!
    Current Issue
    Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
    Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
    Flash Poll
    [Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
    [Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
    As cyber attackers become more sophisticated and enterprise defenses become more complex, many enterprises are faced with a complicated question: what is the risk of an IT security breach? This report delivers insight on how today's enterprises evaluate the risks they face. This report also offers a look at security professionals' concerns about a wide variety of threats, including cloud security, mobile security, and the Internet of Things.
    Slideshows
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2017-0290
    Published: 2017-05-09
    NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

    CVE-2016-10369
    Published: 2017-05-08
    unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

    CVE-2016-8202
    Published: 2017-05-08
    A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

    CVE-2016-8209
    Published: 2017-05-08
    Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

    CVE-2017-0890
    Published: 2017-05-08
    Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.