Vulnerabilities / Threats
4/11/2014
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Free Heartbleed-Checker Released for Firefox Browser

Browser plug-ins arrive for Firefox and Chrome that scan websites for Heartbleed risk

A developer today released a free add-on for Mozilla Firefox that checks websites for vulnerability to the massive Heartbleed flaw. Tom Brennan, founder of ProactiveRISK, says he wrote the tool after getting an overwhelming number of requests from family and friends about how to protect themselves from websites that are vulnerable to Heartbleed. "They just wanted their browser to tell them, like a radar detector," Brennan says. 

The browser plug-in provides color-coding warnings for websites: Red means the site is vulnerable to Heartbleed. Green means it's safe. There's also a yellow warning for sites that may be vulnerable.

"Like a traffic light on the Internet, it is the users' responsibility to be proactive about risk in addition to the sysadmin defender working hard every day to put out the fire of the day," Brennan says.

"The code is open-source and a donation to the community," he says. "And maybe it will stop the phone calls from users asking for suggestions to something they don't control."

A similar tool for Chrome was released yesterday by developer Jamie Hoyle. The Chromebleed Checker add-in for the Chrome browser also warns users of Heartbleed-vulnerable sites.

"Whilst some servers have been patched already, many remain that have not been patched. Chromebleed uses a web service developed by Filippo Valsorda and checks the URL of the page you have just loaded," the Chromebleed description says. "If it is affected by Heartbleed, then a Chrome notification will be displayed."

Valsorda this week released one of the first tools to scan websites for Heartbleed vulnerability. Errata Security did an initial scan this week for vulnerable sites using its masscan tool. Vendors such as Qualys and LastPass have released free website scanners, and there is also a Metasploit module for Heartbleed.

Meanwhile, Apple told news site Recode that IOS and OS X do not use the vulnerable version of SSL and that its "key Web-based services were not affected."

 

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Randy Naramore
50%
50%
Randy Naramore,
User Rank: Ninja
4/14/2014 | 4:18:47 PM
Re: Great tools
Chrome Checker is doing well for me also.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
4/14/2014 | 9:11:54 AM
Re: Different Solutions
I second Ryan's question about where other DR community members are in their remediation efforts for Heartbleed. We've collected some data in our online flash poll (see column on the far right or click here). But so far about 65 percent of respondents have installed or in the process of installing the update and 40 percent are replacing digital certificates. 

If you haven't taken the poll, check it out. And also let's talk about what you are (or aren't doing about it) in the the comments. 
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/11/2014 | 6:13:59 PM
Different Solutions
These checkers are very nifty. From a corporate standpoint, my company ran vulnerability scans to check and see if any of our servers were running the OpenSSL with the HeartBeat extension. What are other methods people have been using and what steps were taken to remediate?
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
4/11/2014 | 10:58:41 AM
Great tools
I just tried the Chromebleed checker. Very cool! Thanks Kelly for reportng this and also to Jamie Hoyle (Chromebleed) and Tom Brennan (Firefox) for developing these tools. 
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-5395
Published: 2014-11-21
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Huawei HiLink E3276 and E3236 TCPU before V200R002B470D13SP00C00 and WebUI before V100R007B100D03SP01C03, E5180s-22 before 21.270.21.00.00, and E586Bs-2 before 21.322.10.00.889 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users ...

CVE-2014-7137
Published: 2014-11-21
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Dolibarr ERP/CRM before 3.6.1 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) contactid parameter in an addcontact action, (2) ligne parameter in a swapstatut action, or (3) project_ref parameter to projet/tasks/contact.php; (4...

CVE-2014-7871
Published: 2014-11-21
SQL injection vulnerability in Open-Xchange (OX) AppSuite before 7.4.2-rev36 and 7.6.x before 7.6.0-rev23 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted jslob API call.

CVE-2014-8090
Published: 2014-11-21
The REXML parser in Ruby 1.9.x before 1.9.3 patchlevel 551, 2.0.x before 2.0.0 patchlevel 598, and 2.1.x before 2.1.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) a crafted XML document containing an empty string in an entity that is used in a large number of nes...

CVE-2014-8469
Published: 2014-11-21
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Guests/Boots in AdminCP in Moxi9 PHPFox before 4 Beta allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the User-Agent header.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?