Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

Study: Users Would Give Up Free Coffee To Get Better Mobile Device Access At Work

Some users would even trade a vacation day -- but is consumerization safe for enterprises?

Jul 30, 2011 | 12:54 AM | 

By Tim Wilson
Dark Reading
Employees are ready to give up free coffee, free parking, or even a vacation day in order to get better access for their personal mobile devices in the workplace, according to a study released this week. But experts say "consumerization" of IT still poses a major risk for most enterprises.

The study, conducted by Kelton Research on behalf of Sybase Inc., shows that end users are becoming impatient with employers that restrict the use of mobile devices at work.

"This latest survey is a wake-up call for enterprises to broaden and accelerate their enterprise mobility strategies," said Dan Ortega, senior director of product marketing at Sybase. "Employees are beginning to have a much greater understanding of mobility, resulting in greater expectations from IT. We're seeing more demand for mobile-focused methods of productivity, such as being able to use a variety of devices in the workplace, or being able to gain access to corporate applications through an app store environment."

Seventy-one percent of the 500 survey respondents said they feel so strongly about using their own device that they are willing to give up at least one thing in the workplace in exchange for the ability to use it. Free coffee (58 percent) topped the list, followed by free food (39 percent) and office supplies (30 percent). Some were even willing to give up paid parking (26 percent), or a vacation day (20 percent).

Only 19 percent of participants strongly agree that their employers make it as easy for them to do their jobs from a mobile device as they can from a work computer. Almost half (44 percent) state that they don't have access to enough mobile applications to ensure they can do their jobs as well as they can from their work computers.

But security remains a key stumbling block to consumerization in the enterprise, the study says. More than a third (35 percent)of respondents said they send work-related emails or documents (32 percent) to their personal email accounts, or use their personal devices to access the company intranet from remote locations (29 percent).

Tom Kellermann, CTO at mobile security technology vendor AirPatrol, confirms that employees are continually pushing their companies to open up their mobile device access policies. But consumerization carries a heavy risk, he says.

"The mobile and wireless worlds are not civilized," Kellermann says. "There are threats from nation-states and from organized crime. There are leaks caused by employees who break policy, knowingly or not. There will be attacks on these devices -- it's inevitable."

Before they can allow employees to use personal devices in the workplace, organizations need to know more about where the devices are being used, who else is in proximity, and whether the users are following security policy, Kellermann says.

"There's a connection between physical security and logical security that needs to take place," Kellermann says. "You need some context and some situational awareness before you can allow the user to connect to the workplace environment."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS












Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports
Bugs
ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
Vulnerability:ssl-vpn end-point interrogator/installer activex control
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Stack-based buffer overflow in SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) before 10.5.2 and 10.0.5 hotfix 3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long (1) CabURL and (2) Location arguments to the Install3rdPartyComponent method.
Vulnerability:gvim
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Untrusted search path vulnerability in VIM Development Group GVim before 7.3.034, and possibly other versions before 7.3.46, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse User32.dll or other DLL that is located in the same folder as a .TXT file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Vulnerability:cforms
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in wp-content/plugins/cforms/lib_ajax.php in cforms WordPress plugin 11.5 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) rs and (2) rsargs[] parameters.
Vulnerability:links, wsn links, wsn links
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in search.php in WSN Links 5.0.x before 5.0.81, 5.1.x before 5.1.51, and 6.0.x before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) namecondition or (2) namesearch parameter.
Vulnerability:deluxebb
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:SQL injection vulnerability in misc.php in DeluxeBB 1.3, and possibly earlier, when magic_quotes_gpc is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the xthedateformat parameter in a register action, a different vector than CVE-2005-2989, CVE-2006-2503, and CVE-2009-1033.