Welcome Guest. | Log In | Register | Membership Benefits

Cost Of Data Breaches Up Again, Ponemon Study Says

Cost per breached record hits $214; average breach costs $7.2 million

Mar 10, 2011 | 01:25 AM | 

By Tim Wilson

Everything's more expensive these days -- and experiencing a major corporate data breach is no exception.

The Ponemon Institute and Symantec earlier this week released the findings of the "2010 Annual Study: U.S. Cost of a Data Breach," which reveals data breaches grew more costly for the fifth year in a row.

The average organizational cost of a data breach increased to $7.2 million and cost companies an average of $214 per compromised record, markedly higher when compared to $204 in 2009, according to the researchers.

"Every year I predict that the costs will go down, and every year, I'm wrong," quipped Larry Ponemon, founder of the Ponemon Institute. "We did see some leveling off last year, but the overall costs are still on the rise."

The sixth annual report is based on the actual data breach experiences of 51 U.S. companies from 15 different industry sectors.

Interestingly, companies that responded quickly to data breaches ended up paying 54 percent more per record than companies that moved more slowly, according to the study. Forty-three percent of companies notified victims within one month of discovering the breach, up seven points from 2009. In 2010, these quick responders had a per-record cost of $268, up 22 percent from 2009; companies that took longer paid $174 per record, down 11 percent.

Malicious or criminal attacks are the most expensive breaches, the study says, and are on the rise. In this year’s study, 31 percent of all cases involved a malicious or criminal act -- up seven points from 2009 --and the cost of these compromises averaged $318 per record, up 43 percent from 2009.

While external breaches are on the increase, negligence remains the most common threat, Ponemon says. The number of breaches caused by negligence edged up one point to 41 percent and averaged $196 per record, up 27 percent from 2009.

Companies are more vigilant about preventing system failures, according to the report. System failure dropped nine points to 27 percent in 2010. "This trend indicates organizations may be more conscientious in ensuring their systems can prevent and mitigate breaches through new security technologies and compliance with security policies and regulations," Ponemon says.

Encryption and other technologies are gaining ground as post-breach remedies, but training and awareness programs remain the most popular, the study says. Sixty-three percent of respondents use training and awareness programs after data breaches, down four points from 2009. Encryption is the second-most implemented preventive measure as a result of a data breach, with 61 percent. Both encryption and data loss prevention (DLP) solutions have increased 17 percent since 2008.

The study takes into account a wide range of business costs, including expense outlays for detection, escalation, notification, and after-the-fact (ex-post) response. The study also analyzes the economic impact of lost or diminished customer trust and confidence as measured by customer churn or turnover rates.

"Churn is still the highest cost that we see," Ponemon said. "There's an attitude out there that users no longer care about their privacy as much, but our data shows that they really do."

The U.S. Cost of a Data Breach Study was derived from a detailed analysis of 51 data breach cases with a range of nearly 4,200 to 105,000 affected records. The study found there is a positive correlation between the number of records lost and the cost of an incident. Companies analyzed were from 15 different industries.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dark Reading encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dark Reading moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Dark Reading further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS












Featured Webcasts
Featured Whitepapers
Featured Reports
Bugs
ENTERPRISE VULNERABILITIES
Vulnerability:ssl-vpn end-point interrogator/installer activex control
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Stack-based buffer overflow in SonicWALL SSL-VPN End-Point Interrogator/Installer ActiveX control (Aventail.EPInstaller) before 10.5.2 and 10.0.5 hotfix 3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long (1) CabURL and (2) Location arguments to the Install3rdPartyComponent method.
Vulnerability:gvim
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Untrusted search path vulnerability in VIM Development Group GVim before 7.3.034, and possibly other versions before 7.3.46, allows local users, and possibly remote attackers, to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse User32.dll or other DLL that is located in the same folder as a .TXT file. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Vulnerability:cforms
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in wp-content/plugins/cforms/lib_ajax.php in cforms WordPress plugin 11.5 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) rs and (2) rsargs[] parameters.
Vulnerability:links, wsn links, wsn links
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:High
Description:Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in search.php in WSN Links 5.0.x before 5.0.81, 5.1.x before 5.1.51, and 6.0.x before 6.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) namecondition or (2) namesearch parameter.
Vulnerability:deluxebb
Published:2010-11-03
Severity:Medium
Description:SQL injection vulnerability in misc.php in DeluxeBB 1.3, and possibly earlier, when magic_quotes_gpc is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the xthedateformat parameter in a register action, a different vector than CVE-2005-2989, CVE-2006-2503, and CVE-2009-1033.



Briefing Centers
POWERFUL INFORMATION
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
(SPONSORED LINKS)