According to Verizon's much-awaited 2011 Data Breach Investigations Report, the number of compromised records involved in data breaches investigated by Verizon and the U.S. Secret Service dropped from 144 million in 2009 to only 4 million in 2010, representing the lowest volume of data loss since the report’s launch in 2008.
But this year’s report covers approximately 760 data breaches, the largest caseload to date, according to the researchers. So while the number of breaches continues to go up, the number of records affected is going down.
"The seeming contradiction between the low data loss and the high number of breaches likely stems from a significant decline in large-scale breaches, caused by a change in tactics by cybercriminals," the report says. "They are engaging in small, opportunistic attacks, rather than large-scale, difficult attacks, and are using relatively unsophisticated methods to successfully penetrate organizations."
"I think what we're seeing is that there's a big change in the type of data that criminals are going after," says Dave Ostertag, global investigations manager at Verizon Business. "There's a glut of personal data out there now, and there really isn't a great market for it. The value of intellectual property, on the other hand, is much higher -- criminals are finding that they can make as much money from stealing a smaller number of highly sensitive records as they can from stealing a big database of customer information."
The report also found that outsiders are responsible for 92 percent of breaches, a significant increase from the 2010 findings. Although the percentage of insider attacks decreased significantly over the previous year (16 percent versus 49 percent), this is largely due to the huge increase in smaller external attacks, Verizon says. The total number of insider attacks actually remained relatively constant.
Hacking (50 percent) and malware (49 percent) were the most prominent types of attack, with many of those attacks involving weak or stolen credentials and passwords, the report says. For the first time, physical attacks -- such as compromising ATMs -- appeared as one of the three most common ways to steal information, and constituted 29 percent of all cases investigated.
Large-scale breaches dropped dramatically last year, while attacks involving smaller numbers of records increased, Verizon says. "Small to medium-sized businesses represent prime attack targets for many hackers, who favor highly automated, repeatable attacks against these more vulnerable targets," the report states.
"The guys responsible for a big breach are more likely to get caught than somebody who does a lot of little breaches," Ostertag says. "The criminals are learning that they don't need to do a large intrusion to make a steady business. They just follow supply and demand."
Greater reliance on automated attacks means that there are more attempted intrusions than ever, but the level of sophistication has dropped, says Steve Dauber, vice president of marketing at RedSeal Systems, a maker of tools for measuring enterprise security risk and posture.
"If you look at the [Verizon report], you see that most attacks were not targeted at a specific company, but were designed to find the enterprises that were most vulnerable," Dauber says. "Ninety-seven percent of the breaches could have been avoided by using simple controls.
"What this says to me is that we're seeing more and more automated attacks, but most enterprises are responding with human defenses that can't keep up," Dauber says. "With so many automated attacks, companies are going to have to start looking harder at more automated defenses." Malware was a factor in about half of the 2010 caseload and was responsible for almost 80 percent of lost data, according to the report. The most common kinds of malware found were those involving sending data to an external entity, opening backdoors, and keylogger functionalities.
Ineffective, weak or stolen credentials continue to wreak havoc on enterprise security, according to Verizon. "Failure to change default credentials remains an issue, particularly in the financial services, retail, and hospitality industries," the report states.
Ostertag offered some advice for enterprises that want to avoid the types of breaches that Verizon sees.
"Protect your data -- only store data as long as you need it," he advises. "Enable your logs and look at them -- in 46 percent of our cases, the breach is discovered not by the victim, but by a third party. If you're not sure what to look for, ask your security companies about it."
Enterprises should also work hard to enforce the policies they already have in place, Ostertag advises. Companies should be aware of what their employees are using at home, and how personal systems are interacting with corporate systems.
"There's a very high correlation between employees who frequently violate security policy and actual breaches and compromises," Ostertag says. "Make sure your employees are following the protocol, and that they are only getting access to the resources they need to do their jobs."
Have a comment on this story? Please click "Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. |
Fundamentals of User Activity Monitoring
Benchmarking normal activity and then monitoring for users who stray from that norm is an essential strategy for getting ahead of potential data and system breaches. But choosing the right tools is only part of the effort. Without sufficient training, efficient deployment and a good response plan, attackers could gain the upper hand.
Does SIEM Make Sense For Your Company?
A security information and event management system serves as a repository for all the security alerts and logging systems
from a firm's devices. But this can be overkill for a company that is understaffed or has overestimated its security information needs. In this report, we discuss 10 questions to ask yourself in determining whether SIEM makes sense for
you--and how to pick the right system if it does.
Monitoring Tools and Logs Make All The Difference
It's no longer a matter of "if" you get hacked, but when. In this special report, we take a look at ways to measure your security posture and the challenges that lie ahead with the emerging threat landscape.
Other reports from the Security Monitoring Tech Center:
| Sponsored by: |
Security Management 2.0: Time to Replace Your SIEM?
Is it time? Are you waving the white flag? Has your first gen SIEM failed to meet expectations despite your investment? If you are questioning whether your existing product or service can get the job done, you are not alone. Read this Securosis white paper to learn how easy it can be to replace your SIEM with a next generation solution.
IT Executive Guide to Security Intelligence: Transitioning from SIEM to Total Security Intelligence
Read this whitepaper to learn how adopting a next generation SIEM solution provides security intelligence, to allow organizations to maintain comprehensive and cost-effective information security. Discover how security intelligence enables critical concerns in five key areas: Data silo consolidation, threat detection, fraud discovery, risk assessment/risk management, and regulatory compliance.
The Return on Security of QRadar: Improving Operational Efficiencies in Federal Government
In this study, IANS interviewed two Q1 Labs customers using QRadar to assess their Return On Security (ROS). The two customers were providers of service to the U.S. Government and had highly secure environments dealing with extremely sensitive data. The data yielded from the interviews showed substantial benefit to the organizations for the cost, both in money and staff time.
SANS What Works Webcast: Worldwide Retailer Boosts Privacy with Security Intelligence
A leading retailer with stores worldwide was seeking a more innovative tool to protect customer privacy and intellectual property. PCI compliance mandated log collection, but a vast number of different tools generated an overwhelming amount of log data, making it difficult for the small security team to review it effectively. The solution the company chose had to fit into a diverse network, provide intelligent reporting and offer a centralized management console.
Learn How Security Intelligence Can Help Combat WikiLeaks Stuxnet and Advanced Threats
WikiLeaks and Stuxnet have illustrated a few fundamental IT security issues that have underscored the need for Total Security Intelligence to counter advanced threats and to detect anomalous behavior. See how government and commercial organizations are using QRadar as an integral component of their IT security program to identify emerging threats based on context and situational awareness.
MORE NEWSFEED >>>