Perimeter
10/13/2009
04:49 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

In Support of Poor Ol' Windows Vista

We just released the October issue of the CSI Alert to CSI members, and this month we focus on Windows 7. This issue is, in some ways, a follow-up to last year's issue, "The Fate of the Secure OS," in which I said some nice things about Windows Vista, and advised it would be imprudent to completely ignore Windows Vista -- eyes-closed, fingers-in-ears, chanting I'm-not-listening-I'm-not-listening.

We just released the October issue of the CSI Alert to CSI members, and this month we focus on Windows 7. This issue is, in some ways, a follow-up to last year's issue, "The Fate of the Secure OS," in which I said some nice things about Windows Vista, and advised it would be imprudent to completely ignore Windows Vista -- eyes-closed, fingers-in-ears, chanting I'm-not-listening-I'm-not-listening.For supporting Vista I received some abuse. My thoughts were described as "rubbish" by one person and "poppycock" by another. So apparently I'm not popular with Victorian-era gentlemen, which is unfortunate because I like the smoking jackets. However, I'm not counting those lost friendships as much of a loss because it isn't as though they would have allowed me into their gentlemen's clubs to drink brandy and play billiards anyway.

So I stand by my earlier comments in support of poor Vista. Vista was a trailblazer, harangued and maligned by a world that wasn't ready for it. Blamed for the failings of application and device driver developers and for the limitations of aging hardware. Criticized for being too heavy-handed with the security warnings given to protect reckless security-unsavvy users from themselves.

And now, to top it all off, starting Oct. 22 Vista will have to share store shelves with its more easy-going, better-behaved, better-loved little sister, Windows 7 -- Microsoft's new client operating system that has been receiving a steady stream of positive reviews from reviewers seemingly surprised to be writing them.

Windows 7's most charming feature isn't really a feature at all, but rather its knack for just working without making a nuisance of itself. At its core, Windows 7 is exactly the same operating system as Vista, but it has been slimmed down, cleaned up, and fine-tuned -- which is precisely what Vista needed -- so it does what Vista does, but more efficiently and by drawing less attention to itself.

True, Windows 7 is the first Microsoft operating system that doesn't require more processing power than its predecessor. And true User Account Control (UAC) in Windows 7 is a little more flexible, a little more relaxed so you won't be pestered by so many of UAC's notorious privilege escalation prompts. Plus it does have some new, exciting features that are uniquely "7" -- like DirectAccess, BranchCache, VPN Reconnect, and BitLocker To Go. (These tools might collectively be the most compelling reasons to upgrade to Windows 7 because they might make it significantly simpler to provide remote/mobile workers with secure remote access to corporate resources...without VPNs, even.)

But it must nonetheless be said that the limelight will shine more kindly on Windows 7 because the world is now prepared to handle it. After making so many fundamental OS architecture changes to develop Vista -- changes, by the way, that would improve security by making app developers stop requiring admin access for even the simplest actions -- Microsoft had to drag third-party developers, kicking and screaming, to make their applications and device drivers Vista-compatible. Now, however, almost all Vista-compatible applications and drivers will also be compatible with 7. Most businesses and home users have upgraded their hardware since Vista was released in December 2006, or are due for an upgrade, which means more machines have the processing power to smoothly run these richer, heftier operating systems.

Maybe it's the big sister in me that's keen to defend Vista, but just as I joyously state that my little sister is far superior to me, I can state that Windows 7 is probably a better operating system than Vista -- and (when combined with Windows Server 2008 R2) might be the operating system for securely managing a mobile workforce.

Read on for more in the October CSI Alert.

Sara Peters is senior editor at Computer Security Institute. Special to Dark Reading. Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3341
Published: 2014-08-19
The SNMP module in Cisco NX-OS 7.0(3)N1(1) and earlier on Nexus 5000 and 6000 devices provides different error messages for invalid requests depending on whether the VLAN ID exists, which allows remote attackers to enumerate VLANs via a series of requests, aka Bug ID CSCup85616.

CVE-2014-3464
Published: 2014-08-19
The EJB invocation handler implementation in Red Hat JBossWS, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.2.0 and 6.3.0, does not properly enforce the method level restrictions for outbound messages, which allows remote authenticated users to access otherwise restricted JAX-WS handlers ...

CVE-2014-3472
Published: 2014-08-19
The isCallerInRole function in SimpleSecurityManager in JBoss Application Server (AS) 7, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 6.3.0, does not properly check caller roles, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass access restrictions via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-3490
Published: 2014-08-19
RESTEasy 2.3.1 before 2.3.8.SP2 and 3.x before 3.0.9, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 6.3.0, does not disable external entities when the resteasy.document.expand.entity.references parameter is set to false, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files and have...

CVE-2014-3504
Published: 2014-08-19
The (1) serf_ssl_cert_issuer, (2) serf_ssl_cert_subject, and (3) serf_ssl_cert_certificate functions in Serf 0.2.0 through 1.3.x before 1.3.7 does not properly handle a NUL byte in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Dark Reading continuing coverage of the Black Hat 2014 conference brings interviews and commentary to Dark Reading listeners.