Risk
1/27/2012
02:02 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

White House Presses For New Cybersecurity Laws

Congress has dragged its feet for years on passing cybersecurity legislation, so the Obama administration is applying pressure.

Top 10 Open Government Websites
Top 10 Open Government Websites
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The White House is urging Congress to pass President Obama's cybersecurity legislation in 2012 to give officials the authority they need to combat "growing and increasingly sophisticated cyberthreats," according to the leading U.S. cybersecurity official.

White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Howard Schmidt called for legislators to "modernize" outdated laws surrounding cybersecurity by supporting the broad legislative proposal President Obama sent to Congress in May, according to a White House blog post.

"It is our sincere hope that members of Congress will look at the significant amount of public debate that has been occurring on these issues--as well as the work and debate on this issue over the years in the Congress--and continue to work in a bipartisan manner to quickly enact legislation to address the full range of cyber threats facing our nation," Schmidt said.

[ The feds are trying to better understand what is happening in cyberspace. Read FBI Seeks Data-Mining App for Social Media. ]

Indeed, Congress has dragged its feet for years on passing cybersecurity legislation despite the fact that there are numerous bills circulating, some of which call for the same regulations as the White House plan. Congressional leaders had expressed an interest in passing cybersecurity legislation by the end of last year but it did not happen.

Schmidt's urging came a day after President Obama's annual State of the Union address, in which the president mentioned the proposal as a way "to stay one step ahead of our adversaries" by securing cyberspace.

Laws authorizing collaboration with the private sector--which the feds already are engaged in--are a key part of the proposal and should be addressed in whatever Congress passes, Schmidt said.

"Legislation that fails to provide the legislative authorities our professionals need to work with the private sector to ensure the safe and reliable operation of our critical infrastructure networks would not be commensurate with the very real and urgent risks to our nation," he said.

Other aspects of the plan place cybersecurity authority more squarely in the hands of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)--which already has a key role in leading federal cybersecurity efforts--and address data breaches and privacy protections.

Specifically, Obama's legislative proposal clarifies how companies can share information about cyberthreats with the DHS, and allows the agency to help critical infrastructure companies with their cybersecurity needs if the private sector wants assistance.

The DHS also would be responsible for defining risks that controllers of the most critical infrastructure need to mitigate and require them to provide their plans for doing so to the agency.

In terms of data breaches, Obama's legislation includes a national standard for reporting breaches to replace 47 existing state data-breach reporting laws. It also would toughen up minimum punishments for cyber criminals.

The DHS also factors into the privacy-protections built into the White House plan. The department would be required to develop privacy and civil liberties procedures that the Attorney General would oversee and approve, and companies that want to share information with the government would first have to wipe it of any identifying information unrelated to cyber threats.

There has been some opposition to the White House cybersecurity plan. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for instance, worried that placing cybersecurity requirements on critical infrastructure companies would place an undo regulatory and financial burden on them, among other concerns.

How 10 federal agencies are tapping the power of cloud computing--without compromising security. Also in the new, all-digital InformationWeek Government supplement: To judge the success of the OMB's IT reform efforts, we need concrete numbers on cost savings and returns. Download our Cloud In Action issue of InformationWeek Government now. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading, September 16, 2014
Malicious software is morphing to be more targeted, stealthy, and destructive. Are you prepared to stop it?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-2886
Published: 2014-09-18
GKSu 2.0.2, when sudo-mode is not enabled, uses " (double quote) characters in a gksu-run-helper argument, which allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in certain situations involving an untrusted substring within this argument, as demonstrated by an untrusted filename encountered during ins...

CVE-2014-4352
Published: 2014-09-18
Address Book in Apple iOS before 8 relies on the hardware UID for its encryption key, which makes it easier for physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by obtaining this UID.

CVE-2014-4353
Published: 2014-09-18
Race condition in iMessage in Apple iOS before 8 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging the presence of an attachment after the deletion of its parent (1) iMessage or (2) MMS.

CVE-2014-4354
Published: 2014-09-18
Apple iOS before 8 enables Bluetooth during all upgrade actions, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a Bluetooth session.

CVE-2014-4356
Published: 2014-09-18
Apple iOS before 8 does not follow the intended configuration setting for text-message preview on the lock screen, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading this screen.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio