Risk
10/29/2013
04:20 PM
James Bindseil
James Bindseil
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again

More than one third of all data security breaches at government agencies are caused accidentally by internal employees.

Iris Scans: Security Technology In Action
Iris Scans: Security Technology In Action
(click image for larger view)
Hacker groups such as LulzSec and Anonymous likely come to mind when discussing data breaches in the public sector. Both groups, along with other rogue hackers, have proven themselves more than capable of bypassing government security measures and gaining access to confidential data. But, surprisingly, they are not IT's biggest threat.

According to research by the Ponemon Institute, the actions of agency employees can be even riskier. More than one third of all data breaches are internal and unintentionally caused by employees, and federal agencies are not exempt. In fact, the public sector is one of the most targeted industries, second only to financial services.

"While external attackers and their evolving methods pose a great threat to companies, the dangers associated with the insider threat can be equally destructive and insidious," said Larry Ponemon, chairman of the research firm, in a recent interview. "Eight years of research on data breach costs has shown employee behavior to be one of the most pressing issues facing organizations today, up 22% since the first survey."

According to Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, government agencies have seen a steady increase in employee-caused data breaches over the last four years. Employee negligence has caused over 150 breaches since January 2009, resulting in the loss of more than 92.5 million data records.

[ Find out why malicious insider threats are getting harder to stop. Read Insider Threats Get More Difficult To Detect. ]

Unfortunately, public CIOs can't simply "plug the leak," but they can place a greater emphasis on the underlying cause of many data breaches: using insecure, un-managed methods to transfer sensitive data, such as:

-- Easily lost or stolen removable storage, particularly those housing unencrypted data (USBs, hard drives, disks, etc.)

-- Emails containing sensitive data sent to the wrong party

-- Third-party file-sharing and storage websites (Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.)

As occurrences increase in size and frequency, the cost per record lost is also rising. The Ponemon study reveals that the U.S. has one of the highest average costs per record ($136). The study also shows that third-party errors and lost or stolen devices have the most effect on the cost of a data breach.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Chuck Brooks
50%
50%
Chuck Brooks,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/8/2013 | 9:31:03 PM
re: Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again
James is on point, cybersecurity risks are often teh result of internal breaches. The best way to address this is to have Informed risk management for employees on security protocols and processes to provide basic security awareness/identify threats.

-+
-+
pcalento011
50%
50%
pcalento011,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/31/2013 | 3:28:51 AM
re: Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again
While certainly a "culture of security" can help address the threat, poorly architected systems also pose a risk. I'm not saying cloud computing or Big Data or any other technology is to blame, but a lack of planning leads to a lack of security. Blaming employees is too easy.
Ulf Mattsson
50%
50%
Ulf Mattsson,
User Rank: Moderator
10/30/2013 | 9:31:33 PM
re: Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again
I agree that "Secure and manage data in motion" and "Tightening the security perimeter will always be a top priority for federal IT professionals", but I think that the perimeter is gone and that the most attractive target is data in large databases.

I think that the flow of sensitive data across different systems and databases should be protected. I recently read an interesting study from Aberdeen Group about security-related incidents. The study revealed that GÇ£Over the last 12 months, tokenization users had 50% fewer security-related incidents(e.g., unauthorized access, data loss or data exposure than tokenization non-usersGÇ¥. The name of the study is GÇ£Tokenization Gets TractionGÇ¥.

I also think that security teams need to look at if data access patterns are normal for users that are accessing sensitive data. Tools can help to determine if the pattern is normal, is this what the typical employee does as part of their work, or is this behavior out of the ordinary.

Ulf Mattsson, CTO Protegrity
D. Henschen
50%
50%
D. Henschen,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/30/2013 | 6:38:01 PM
re: Think Hackers Are IT's Biggest Threat? Guess Again
This article has a government spin, but it's also very applicable to the private sector. Pay close heed to the practical advice on page two on curbing unintended data breaches unwittingly instigated by internal employees.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-4497
Published: 2015-08-29
Use-after-free vulnerability in the CanvasRenderingContext2D implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 40.0.3 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by leveraging improper interaction between resize events and changes to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) token...

CVE-2015-4498
Published: 2015-08-29
The add-on installation feature in Mozilla Firefox before 40.0.3 and Firefox ESR 38.x before 38.2.1 allows remote attackers to bypass an intended user-confirmation requirement by constructing a crafted data: URL and triggering navigation to an arbitrary http: or https: URL at a certain early point i...

CVE-2014-9651
Published: 2015-08-28
Buffer overflow in CHICKEN 4.9.0.x before 4.9.0.2, 4.9.x before 4.9.1, and before 5.0 allows attackers to have unspecified impact via a positive START argument to the "substring-index[-ci] procedures."

CVE-2015-1171
Published: 2015-08-28
Stack-based buffer overflow in GSM SIM Utility (aka SIM Card Editor) 6.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long entry in a .sms file.

CVE-2015-2987
Published: 2015-08-28
Type74 ED before 4.0 misuses 128-bit ECB encryption for small files, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain plaintext data via differential cryptanalysis of a file with an original length smaller than 128 bits.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Another Black Hat is in the books and Dark Reading was there. Join the editors as they share their top stories, biggest lessons, and best conversations from the premier security conference.