Risk
5/25/2010
05:40 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Tabnapping' Attack Simplifies Phishing

With a bit of malicious JavaScript code, Web browser tabs can be altered when hidden from view.

Mozilla's creative lead for Firefox, Aza Raskin, has developed novel phishing attack that Firefox engineers will need address.

Raskin calls the attack "tabnapping" because it can replace the content of a Web page that's open in an inactive browser tab -- and thus isn't visible at the moment it's being changed -- with a page designed to capture personal information.




Image Gallery: Top 12 Firefox Add-Ons
(click for larger image and for full photo gallery)
While the user of a Web browser is looking at an active tab, malicious JavaScript code on one of the hidden, inactive tabs that happens to be open can replace the loaded page with new content, such as a fake Gmail login page.

As Raskin demonstrates on his Web site, the code also replaces the favicon -- the tiny graphic element that shows up on tabs and to the left of the browser address bar -- of the inactive tab page with the Gmail favicon.

The result is a phishing page that is very easy to mistake for a legitimate Gmail login page.

"As the user scans their many open tabs, the favicon and title act as a strong visual cue -- memory is malleable and moldable and the user will most likely simply think they left a Gmail tab open," explains Raskin in a blog post. "When they click back to the fake Gmail tab, they’ll see the standard Gmail login page, assume they’ve been logged out, and provide their credentials to log in. The attack preys on the perceived immutability of tabs."

The attack works in current versions of Firefox, but not current versions of Chrome or Safari. It's certainly avoidable, if the user is alert. But such attacks rely on the fact that users are often not wary enough.

Raskin says there are many ways the attack can be made more effective. He adds that the attack shows the need for improvements on traditional password-based authentication, such as the Firefox Account Manager that Mozilla is developing.

Update, 5/26/10: Aza Raskin wrote to say that Chrome wasn't initially vulnerable because of a bug. Now that the bug is fixed, it is vulnerable, he claims.

Jerry Bryant, group manager of response communications at Microsoft, also offered this lengthy statement:

Safety online is about defense-in-depth. Internet Explorer 8 includes world-class technologies such as the SmartScreen Filter and Domain Highlighting. These technologies, along with the Lock icon, help block the malicious pages required for this kind of attack, and highlight that such pages are not ones the user should trust.

Before entering personal information on any Web site, users should always check that the Lock icon is present in the address bar and that the Web address of the page is one they’d expect given the service they think they are using. Domain Name helps users do this by highlighting in black the actual domain of the page they’re visiting.

Behind the scenes, the SmartScreen Filter also plays a role in combating this sort of hijacking attempt. SmartScreen successfully blocks millions of views of malicious pages each month and would help protect the user in this situation. Some stories indicated that Internet Explorer on XP was susceptible to the available Proof of Concept code released on a Web page by Mozilla. Those stories are not complete. Since the site/code is not malicious, it did not trigger the SmartScreen filter which would protect these users against this PoC.

When understanding the real world risk of situations like this, it is really important to consider the defense-in-depth protections offered by Internet Explorer.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "Why else would HR ask me if I have a handicap?"
Current Issue
The Changing Face of Identity Management
Mobility and cloud services are altering the concept of user identity. Here are some ways to keep up.
Flash Poll
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-7445
Published: 2015-10-15
The Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.x mishandles requests for Graphics Execution Manager (GEM) objects, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an application that processes graphics data, as demonstrated b...

CVE-2015-4948
Published: 2015-10-15
netstat in IBM AIX 5.3, 6.1, and 7.1 and VIOS 2.2.x, when a fibre channel adapter is used, allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5660
Published: 2015-10-15
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in eXtplorer before 2.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute PHP code.

CVE-2015-6003
Published: 2015-10-15
Directory traversal vulnerability in QNAP QTS before 4.1.4 build 0910 and 4.2.x before 4.2.0 RC2 build 0910, when AFP is enabled, allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files by leveraging access to an OS X (1) user or (2) guest account.

CVE-2015-6333
Published: 2015-10-15
Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) 1.1j allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving addition of an SSH key, aka Bug ID CSCuw46076.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio

The cybersecurity profession struggles to retain women (figures range from 10 to 20 percent). It's particularly worrisome for an industry with a rapidly growing number of vacant positions.

So why does the shortage of women continue to be worse in security than in other IT sectors? How can men in infosec be better allies for women; and how can women be better allies for one another? What is the industry doing to fix the problem -- what's working, and what isn't?

Is this really a problem at all? Are the low numbers simply an indication that women do not want to be in cybersecurity, and is it possible that more women will never want to be in cybersecurity? How many women would we need to see in the industry to declare success?

Join Dark Reading senior editor Sara Peters and guests Angela Knox of Cloudmark, Barrett Sellers of Arbor Networks, Regina Wallace-Jones of Facebook, Steve Christey Coley of MITRE, and Chris Roosenraad of M3AAWG on Wednesday, July 13 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss all this and more.