12:34 PM

Senate Bill Seeks Greater NSA Surveillance Oversight

Proposed legislation would require greater monitoring and privacy controls for NSA surveillance programs designed to gather foreign intelligence.

Legislation introduced Monday seeks to rein in what some senators see as overly broad interpretations of the Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by the National Security Agency (NSA).

The proposed FISA Accountability and Privacy Protection Act of 2013 was introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, together with a bipartisan group of senators, including Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), Mark Udall (D-Colo.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

National intelligence director James Clapper has said that the NSA's bulk collection of phone records has been authorized by section 215 of the Patriot Act, while section 702 of FISA has been used to authorize Prism, which involves the mass collection of phone and Internet communications, among other programs.

[ With charges formally filed against him, Edward Snowden is reportedly trying to gain asylum in Ecuador, but currently his whereabouts are unknown. Read NSA Leaker Snowden On The Run. ]

"The recent public revelations about two classified data collection programs have brought renewed attention to the government's broad surveillance authorities, and they underscore the need for close scrutiny by Congress," Leahy said in a statement. Accordingly, he said, his legislation would "narrow the scope of Section 215 orders by requiring the government to show both relevance to an authorized investigation and a link to a foreign group or power." Currently authorities must demonstrate only that a requested intercept relates to an authorized investigation.

Leahy's proposed legislation would also require that national security letters (NSLs) -- which are secret demands for information issued to an individual or organization -- would expire after a preset period of time. Currently, NSLs cannot be challenged in court until one year after they are received, but Leahy's legislation would allow recipients to challenge them immediately.

Details of the NSA's top-secret surveillance programs, as well as the secret court orders authorizing those programs, were leaked earlier this month by former CIA employee and NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

Intelligence officials continue to maintain that the surveillance programs operate within the law. "I'm confident that we're following the laws that our country has in doing what we do. We have a set of laws that guide how NSA acts; we follow those laws. We have tremendous oversight by all three portions of the government: the courts, Congress and the administration," Gen. Keith Alexander, director of the NSA, told ABC News Sunday. "Now when you look at these laws and the way they've been passed and the oversight mechanisms that we have, I am confident that we are following our laws."

But multiple lawmakers, including Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), who authored the Patriot Act, have criticized the breadth of the surveillance programs. "I am extremely disturbed by what appears to be an overbroad interpretation of the Act," Sensenbrenner wrote in letter to Attorney General Eric Holder earlier this month.

Do the programs provide an effective intelligence and law enforcement tool without undermining people's privacy rights? Detailed answers to that question remain largely classified. But according to senators Wyden and Udall, one recent related public statement made by Alexander -- who's claimed that intelligence gathered via the programs has helped foil 50 terror threats -- has been inaccurate.

The senators wrote to Alexander Monday, requesting corrections to a recently released NSA fact sheet on some of its surveillance activities. "In our judgment this inaccuracy is significant, as it portrays protections for Americans' privacy being significantly stronger than they actually are," they wrote.

But they couldn't publicly detail the inaccuracy, because the information they referenced is classified. Instead, they detailed their criticism in an attached confidential letter.

The senators also characterized the fact sheet as "misleading," stating that "inadvertently acquired communication of or concerning a U.S. person must be promptly destroyed" unless it's relevant to an active investigation. That's because the senators said that multiple intelligence officials have repeatedly stated that it was impossible to know how many U.S. residents' communications were reviewed by FISA-authorized programs.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
6/25/2013 | 11:01:22 PM
re: Senate Bill Seeks Greater NSA Surveillance Oversight
Gen. Keith Alexander video was pretty scary as being in tech it sounded to me like they didn't include system admins within group policy monitoring nor were there adequate audit trails. It was a joke to listen to just as were Feinstein and Pelosi as she was addressing some very intelligent people, folks who write complex programs and are system administrators themselves...again...we are beyond the magpie "me toos" that they offered as it meant nothing.

How about some digital laws that finally are specific to IT infrastructures...lol...I know scares the daylights out of congress...but they have to do it.


Also never seen such a group that was afraid to take time and educate themselves, as I have been a big proponent of restoring the Office of Technology Assessment...that's a tool for all of them to use...but even if they did restore the office and get help on board how many would use it..the next question...what a bunch of "its for those guys over there" paradigms...


Want to catch a thief, well then think like one, want to catch a systems administrator, well then think like one. The side show the White House and Congress is running is indeed sad and there will be little support from technology companies because their politics are just walking all over folks like me with thinking they are superior when the truth is known it's the other way around. There's a great former Wall Street Quant who does a really good job with this and talks even about her days working at DE Shaw with Larry Summers. It is funny to hear her say and at the same time feel insulted when they would come back on all her hard futures work and want the charts in blue and red:) Nerds re never in control and she's right and thus so there will be little or no support to the government in the Snowden effort, self opinion included. Give Cathy's video a look and you won't be sorry and it's a good learning experience.


Sadly a while back I said myself that the White House cabinet was catching the digital illiterate GOP virus going around and it's about what we are seeing.
New Mexico Man Sentenced on DDoS, Gun Charges
Dark Reading Staff 5/18/2018
Is Threat Intelligence Garbage?
Chris McDaniels, Chief Information Security Officer of Mosaic451,  5/23/2018
More Than Half of Users Reuse Passwords
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  5/24/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Shhh!  They're watching... And you have a laptop?  
Current Issue
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
[Strategic Security Report] Navigating the Threat Intelligence Maze
Most enterprises are using threat intel services, but many are still figuring out how to use the data they're collecting. In this Dark Reading survey we give you a look at what they're doing today - and where they hope to go.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-25
Liblouis 3.5.0 has a stack-based Buffer Overflow in the function parseChars in compileTranslationTable.c.
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
The AXIS webapp in deploy-tomcat/axis in IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager (TADDM) 7.1.2 and 7.2.0 through allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive configuration information via a direct request, as demonstrated by happyaxis.jsp. IBM X-Force ID: 84354.
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager (TADDM) 7.1.2 and 7.2.0 through might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about Tomcat credentials by sniffing the network for a session in which HTTP is used. IBM X-Force ID: 84361.
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 8.5 through on UNIX allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging improper process initialization. IBM X-Force ID: 84362.
PUBLISHED: 2018-05-24
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader before 9.1 and PhantomPDF before 9.1. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw...