Risk
3/12/2014
12:30 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Retail Industry May Pool Intel To Stop Breaches

Target and other shopper-data breaches turn up the heat on retail industry to establish a cyberthreat Information-Sharing and Analysis Center.

The massive data breach at Target, along with a wave of other attacks on retailers that has come to light in the past few months, has turned up the heat on the retail sector to formalize intelligence-sharing on threats and attacks on the industry.

Retail industry officials say their sector now is considering several ways to better prepare for and defend against the increasing wave of targeted attacks on its members, including the formation of a Merchant and Retail Industry Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC).

ISACs provide an official mechanism for sharing information about the latest malware and cybercrime activity spotted targeting specific industries. They also include databases of those threats and vulnerabilities for their members. There are some 16 ISACs for specific industries, including the financial industry's FS-ISAC, as well as ISACs in the electricity, water, supply chain, research, and education sectors. The goal is to help the industries better team up in the face of cybercrime and cyberespionage. 

Read the rest of this story on Dark Reading.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Senior Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise Magazine, ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Moderator
3/12/2014 | 4:15:09 PM
Re: Formal vs. informal
Heartland Payment Systems began working with the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center in 2009 after was it by a major breach. Sharing threat information may be a worthy idea, but it doesn't seem to reduce the number of breaches.
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Ninja
3/12/2014 | 3:35:42 PM
Formal vs. informal
Kelly, Don't you think information is being exchanged informally among CISOs already, at various venues? How much difference will a formal forum make -- in fact, couldn't it backfire by becoming a target?
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Flash Poll
Current Issue
Cartoon
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-0103
Published: 2014-07-29
WebAccess in Zarafa before 7.1.10 and WebApp before 1.6 stores credentials in cleartext, which allows local Apache users to obtain sensitive information by reading the PHP session files.

CVE-2014-0475
Published: 2014-07-29
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.20 allow context-dependent attackers to bypass ForceCommand restrictions and possibly have other unspecified impact via a .. (dot dot) in a (1) LC_*, (2) LANG, or other locale environment variable.

CVE-2014-0889
Published: 2014-07-29
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in IBM Atlas Suite (aka Atlas Policy Suite), as used in Atlas eDiscovery Process Management through 6.0.3, Disposal and Governance Management for IT through 6.0.3, and Global Retention Policy and Schedule Management through 6.0.3, allow remote atta...

CVE-2014-2226
Published: 2014-07-29
Ubiquiti UniFi Controller before 3.2.1 logs the administrative password hash in syslog messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtains sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-3020
Published: 2014-07-29
install.sh in the Embedded WebSphere Application Server (eWAS) 7.0 before FP33 in IBM Tivoli Integrated Portal (TIP) 2.1 and 2.2 sets world-writable permissions for the installRoot directory tree, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse program.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio