Risk
12/11/2010
01:44 PM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

Researchers: Major Ad Networks Serving Malware

Researchers at web security firm Armorize Technologies recently discovered that DoubleClick and Microsoft ad networks were serving (for a brief time) a banner ad tainted with malware. The attack could had of impacted millions, the researchers day.

Researchers at web security firm Armorize Technologies recently discovered that DoubleClick and Microsoft ad networks were serving (for a brief time) a banner ad tainted with malware. The attack could had of impacted millions, the researchers day.Armorize chief technology officer Wayne Huang revealed in this blog post that two of the world's largest ad networks were actively serving malware and potentially infecting visitors to Web sites serving those ads. Millions of web users could had of been infected, Armorize CEO Caleb Sima told InformationWeek in an interview.

The payload in the attacks is a malicious program known as HDD Plus, which is a bogus system analysis and optimization program.

Armorize discovered the attacks on December 4 through its HackAlert offering. HackAlert is designed to identify Web sites and online advertisements infected with malware. The malware was served through JavaScript code transferred through online ads from DoubleClick, Sima said.

From their blog post on the attack:

Behavior: Users visit websites that incorporate banner ads from DoubleClick or rad.msn.com, the malicious javascript is served from ADShufffle.com (notice the three f's), starts a drive-by download process and if successful, HDD Plus and other malware are installed into the victim's machine, without having the need to trick the victim into doing anything or clicking on anything. Simply visiting the page infects the visitors.

Known sites affected: Sites that incorporate DoubleClick or rad.msn.com banners, including for example Scout.com (using DoubleClick), realestate.msn.com, msnbc.com (using both), and mail.live.com. We'd like to note here it's very possible that multiple exchanges, besides those listed here, have been serving the fake ADShufffle's ads.

Notice the three Fs in the name ADShufffle, it's a deft fake of the legitimate AdShuffle.

Here's a list of the exploits and malware used in the attack:

Initially with DoubleClick: 1) Internet Explorer iepeers (CVE-2010-0806)

Later with DoubleClick and rad.msn.com: 2) JDT: Java Web Start Arbitrary command-line injection (CVE-2010-0886) 3) Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat 9 GetIcon (CVE-2009-0927) 4) Microsoft MDAC RDS.Dataspace ActiveX (CVE-2006-0003) 5) Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x Doc.media.newPlayer () 6) Adobe Acrobat and Reader util.printf (CVE-2008-2992) 7) Adobe Reader GetMailInfo (CVE-2007-5659)

Malware installed: Over the past week, ADShufffle kept on changing the malware. Besides HDD Plus, other types of malware, such as backdoors, have been served. Later in the article we will provide links to our observed binaries.

Exploit packs used: Primarily a modified version of Eleonore. Neosploit was also used. With neosploit, malicious binaries are obfuscated on-the-fly before being served.

Not a trivial attack. And users who visited web sites serving the attack advertising were hit with the payload without having to click on anything; large web sites such as MSBC were affected; the exploits were well obfuscated; and according to Armorize, anti-virus vendors were very poor in initial detection rates.

Because these ads have the potential to be served to millions of web browsers, it's nearly impossible to determine how many people could have been infected. One thing that can be determined with more certainty: expect more of these kinds of attacks.

Such ad networks and other shared services, like web application widgets, have the potential to quickly hit millions of users. My bet is that it is only a matter of time before we see many more similar incidents.

While there's never any good news in such breaches, it's promising DoubleClick, Microsoft, and AdShuffle (the legitimate one) were able to quickly clamp down on the attack.

For my security and technology observations throughout the day, find me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-5084
Published: 2015-08-02
The Siemens SIMATIC WinCC Sm@rtClient and Sm@rtClient Lite applications before 01.00.01.00 for Android do not properly store passwords, which allows physically approximate attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2015-5352
Published: 2015-08-02
The x11_open_helper function in channels.c in ssh in OpenSSH before 6.9, when ForwardX11Trusted mode is not used, lacks a check of the refusal deadline for X connections, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a connection outside of the permitted time ...

CVE-2015-5537
Published: 2015-08-02
The SSL layer of the HTTPS service in Siemens RuggedCom ROS before 4.2.0 and ROX II does not properly implement CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-3566.

CVE-2015-5600
Published: 2015-08-02
The kbdint_next_device function in auth2-chall.c in sshd in OpenSSH through 6.9 does not properly restrict the processing of keyboard-interactive devices within a single connection, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute-force attacks or cause a denial of service (CPU consumptio...

CVE-2015-1009
Published: 2015-07-31
Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio before 7.1.3.5 Patch 5 and Wonderware InTouch Machine Edition through 7.1 SP3 Patch 4 use cleartext for project-window password storage, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
What’s the future of the venerable firewall? We’ve invited two security industry leaders to make their case: Join us and bring your questions and opinions!