Risk
2/8/2012
01:25 PM
50%
50%

iOS Social Apps Leak Contact Data

Some apps send iPhone address books in unencrypted format to software vendors' servers--a practice that may not be obvious to all users.

10 Top iOS 5 Apps
10 Top iOS 5 Apps
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Are your iOS applications sharing your personal information with software vendors?

Wednesday, Arun Thampi, a Ruby and iOS developer, said that he'd discovered that a favorite iOS app, Path--billed by its developer as "the smart journal that helps you share life with the ones you love"--was sending an unencrypted copy of his iPhone address book to Path's servers.

"I'm not insinuating that Path is doing something nefarious with my address book, but I feel quite violated that my address book is being held remotely on a third-party service," said Thampi in a blog post. "I love Path as an iOS app and I think there are some brilliant people working on it, but this seems a little creepy."

The same day, Dave Morin, Path's CEO, responded to Thampi by commenting on his blog post. "We actually think this is an important conversation and take this very seriously," said Morin. "We upload the address book to our servers in order to help the user find and connect to their friends and family on Path quickly and [efficiently] as well as to notify them when friends and family join Path. Nothing more."

Furthermore, said Morin, Path recently made such sharing "opt-in" for the Android version of its client, and said that it would do the same beginning with the 2.0.6 version of its iOS software, which is waiting for App Store approval from Apple.

[ Google researcher argues that social media actually enhances personal privacy. Read more at Google Study: Social Media Enhances Privacy. ]

Inspired by Thampi's post, iOS developer Mark Chang posted to his "more of the same" blog that he'd found similar behavior on the part of another iOS social app, Hipster, which is billed by its developer as "a fun way to share where you are and what you're doing."

"I looked at the apps on my own iPhone for information leakage by other apps," Chang said. "I figured this would be common practice, and lo and behold, when booting up Hipster, it seems like parts of my iPhone address book were being uploaded to Hipster."

In a comment added to Chang's post, meanwhile, "nitrofox" reported that a photo app with social capabilities, Instagram, demonstrated similar behavior. Although as another poster commented, this behavior is noted in the app's FAQ, which states that allowing the app to "find friends" then uploads all contacts "via a secure connection in order to locate your contacts' accounts on Instagram." The FAQ also said, "We currently do not store this information."

According to Chester Wisniewski, a senior security advisor at Sophos Canada, multiple iOS apps are clearly failing to detail exactly what they're doing, and he criticized Morin at Path in particular for pursuing a "have-all-of-your-contact-info-first-and-ask-permission-second" strategy.

The problem is furthermore compounded because, unlike Android, the permission system built into iOS devices "doesn't provide notification of what information an app may be sending to its keepers, aside from location information," said Wisniewski in a blog post. "Where was Apple when the original app was released? The lengthy approval process should be looking out for its customers, not just whether it allows you to tether."

We aren't suggesting these companies are going to use this information against your interests, but should they be collecting this information without your knowledge?" Wisniewski continued. "Additionally, insecurely transporting personal information from your phone book, permission or not, is an unacceptable practice."

Social media are generating tons of data, but that data only becomes truly valuable when examined in context. Attend the virtual Enterprise 2.0 event Social Analytics: The Bridge To Business Value, and learn how social analytics will provide the bridge to unlocking business value. It happens Feb. 16.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Dark Reading Live EVENTS
INsecurity - For the Defenders of Enterprise Security
A Dark Reading Conference
While red team conferences focus primarily on new vulnerabilities and security researchers, INsecurity puts security execution, protection, and operations center stage. The primary speakers will be CISOs and leaders in security defense; the blue team will be the focus.
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: " I think Google Doodle is getting a little out of control"
Current Issue
Security Vulnerabilities: The Next Wave
Just when you thought it was safe, researchers have unveiled a new round of IT security flaws. Is your enterprise ready?
Flash Poll
[Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
[Strategic Security Report] Assessing Cybersecurity Risk
As cyber attackers become more sophisticated and enterprise defenses become more complex, many enterprises are faced with a complicated question: what is the risk of an IT security breach? This report delivers insight on how today's enterprises evaluate the risks they face. This report also offers a look at security professionals' concerns about a wide variety of threats, including cloud security, mobile security, and the Internet of Things.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.