Risk
9/27/2013
11:51 AM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Insider Threats Get More Difficult To Detect

User diversity and growth in network activity including cloud services are among reasons it's getting harder to guard against insider data breaches, says Fortune 1000 survey.

Iris Scans: Security Technology In Action
Iris Scans: Security Technology In Action
(click image for larger view)
While Edward Snowden's name will forever be linked to his leak of classified National Security Agency data, it might come to stand for something else: The moment in time when insider threats became as important a security issue to government and other enterprises as advanced persistent threats.

A new survey of more than 700 Fortune 1000 IT pros indicates that the job of protecting against insider threats from employees, contractors or partners -- or those posing as authorized users -- is growing more difficult.

The survey findings, released this week by Enterprise Strategy Group, state that more than half (54%) of enterprise IT pros are finding insider threats more difficult to detect or prevent than they were in 2011. One reason is the increasing sophistication of malicious software that lets users gain legitimate internal access privileges to networks, applications and sensitive data.

[ The head of the National Security Agency defends the agency's actions. Read NSA Chief: Don't Dump Essential Security Tools. ]

"The barriers to network breaches are really melting away," said Alan Kessler, CEO of security vendor Vormetric, which sponsored the research. The firewalls that once kept potential intruders at bay "are essentially gone, because the adversaries are working from inside," he said in an interview with InformationWeek.

But there are other factors. Among survey respondents, 17% of whom work for government agencies or in education:

-- 37% point to the fact that there are more people -- employees, contractors and business partners -- with access to the network, making it more difficult to isolate suspicious behavior.

-- 36% say that the growing use of cloud computing at their organizations makes insider threat detection/prevention more difficult, as it increases the attack surface for insiders.

-- 35% say the growing volume of network activity also makes detection and prevention of insider attacks more difficult, as it makes it harder to baseline normal behavior and pinpoint anomalies.

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/27/2013 | 9:39:19 PM
re: Insider Threats Get More Difficult To Detect
NSA's decision to go to "two-man rule" in handling sensitive data, following Edward Snowden incident, may give a new spin to the notion of two-factor authentication.
AndreG066
50%
50%
AndreG066,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/15/2013 | 7:03:49 PM
re: Insider Threats Get More Difficult To Detect
Dear Editor,

Great article and comment -- allow to please speak to both.

In your article, only one vendor is mentioned, Vormetric, a classic data security company. However, data security is not the correct control against insider threats using any information security management model, principle, or control set. The gap that exists is primarily due to 3 factors:

First is application security -- the Intranets of yesteryear require the same application security controls as everything "outside the firewalls". Second is threat intelligence -- Vormetric will not help if you are facing AVT (Advanced Volatile Threats, an APT that uses strictly in-memory techniques). Lastly, you must have enough staff to handle and respond to incidents at scale. If you want big data for your cyber security programs, you best use your best data to know when to hire, how many, what specific attributes/skills you need pre-/post- COE, and how you're going to be able to hire and train them in time to respond to all of your incidents (including insider threats) at scale.

The insightful comment you gave coincides with my last point -- that identity and authentication/authorization access controls should be modernized and integrated with people. Google, who has used big data to optimize their ID/AuthN systems, will be adding Universal 2-Factor (U2F) to defend their business and assets come January 2014. This is a bold move away from the hokey biometric systems we're seeing in the media. Google, clearly knowledgeable about technologically-advanced insider threats against sensitive operations, does employ role compartmentalization with separation/rotation of duties.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-3409
Published: 2014-10-25
The Ethernet Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) handling feature in Cisco IOS 12.2(33)SRE9a and earlier and IOS XE 3.13S and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed CFM packets, aka Bug ID CSCuq93406.

CVE-2014-4620
Published: 2014-10-25
The EMC NetWorker Module for MEDITECH (aka NMMEDI) 3.0 build 87 through 90, when EMC RecoverPoint and Plink are used, stores cleartext RecoverPoint Appliance credentials in nsrmedisv.raw log files, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading these files.

CVE-2014-4623
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar 6.0.x, 6.1.x, and 7.0.x in Avamar Data Store (ADS) GEN4(S) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE), when Password Hardening before 2.0.0.4 is enabled, uses UNIX DES crypt for password hashing, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain cleartext passwords via a brute-force a...

CVE-2014-4624
Published: 2014-10-25
EMC Avamar Data Store (ADS) and Avamar Virtual Edition (AVE) 6.x and 7.0.x through 7.0.2-43 do not require authentication for Java API calls, which allows remote attackers to discover grid MCUser and GSAN passwords via a crafted call.

CVE-2014-6151
Published: 2014-10-25
CRLF injection vulnerability in IBM Tivoli Integrated Portal (TIP) 2.2.x allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.