Risk
4/24/2012
01:04 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Federal Cyber Overhaul Cost: $710 Million Through 2017

Changes to the Federal Information Security Management Act would set the federal government back $710 million over the next five years, according to an estimate by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.

>Slideshow: Next Generation Defense Technologies
Slideshow: Next Generation Defense Technologies
(click for larger image and for full slideshow)
The House of Representatives bill to overhaul the federal government's cybersecurity regulations, which is slated for a floor vote this week, would cost $710 million through 2017 to implement, the Congressional Budget Office reported Friday.

The Federal Information Security Amendments Act of 2012, one of four cybersecurity bills on the docket in the House this week, would overhaul the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) by requiring agencies to continuously monitor their computer systems for security threats, and setting other new cyber responsibilities for federal agencies and the Office of Management and Budget.

According to the report, much of the new spending would stem from "salaries, expenses, and computer hardware and software." These costs would increase each year, according to the report. However, despite belt tightening across the federal government, cybersecurity is one area where President Obama and Congress have been relatively on the same page about the need for increased spending. Agencies spent an estimated $13 billion on cybersecurity in fiscal 2011, according to the Office of Management and budget.

[ What security threats concern federal IT pros the most? Read Federal IT Survey: Hacktivists, Cybercriminals Are Top Threats. ]

Cybersecurity is the number-one priority of federal IT pros, and FISMA is the federal initiative that holds the most sway over agencies' cybersecurity strategies, according to a recent InformationWeek survey. Agencies' top priorities include implementing continuous monitoring and upgrading standard defenses, the survey found.

In addition to continuous monitoring requirements, the new bill mandates that federal agencies ensure that their regular IT systems and so-called "national security systems" that process classified or otherwise sensitive data have "complementary" standards. The bill also requires that agencies do a better job of securing facilities that store and process classified data. It requires the government to establish security baselines to help agencies gauge the effectiveness of security controls they put in place. The bill also would centralize agency cybersecurity authority under the CIO.

Although the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which sets policy guidance under FISMA, has made significant reforms to FISMA requirements in recent years, some officials and members of Congress have advocated for legislative change, and the Federal Information Security Amendments Act was borne from that discussion.

Unlike a number of other cybersecurity bills working their way through Congress, the Federal Information Security Amendments Act has been a bipartisan effort. It was introduced in March by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and is co-sponsored by Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md.

Other bills up for vote this week include: the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, a cybersecurity information-sharing bill that has been widely criticized by privacy advocates but strongly backed by the private sector; the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act, which aims to improve federal cybersecurity research; and another cyber research and development bill.

In our InformationWeek Government virtual event, Next Steps In Cybersecurity, experts will assess the state of cybersecurity in government and present strategies for creating a more secure IT infrastructure. It happens May 24.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Old Tom See
50%
50%
Old Tom See,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/2/2012 | 7:56:17 PM
re: Federal Cyber Overhaul Cost: $710 Million Through 2017
Sounds like better Cyber snooping is on the way.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading Tech Digest, Dec. 19, 2014
Software-defined networking can be a net plus for security. The key: Work with the network team to implement gradually, test as you go, and take the opportunity to overhaul your security strategy.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-4440
Published: 2014-12-19
Password Generator (aka Pwgen) before 2.07 generates weak non-tty passwords, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to guess the password via a brute-force attack.

CVE-2013-4442
Published: 2014-12-19
Password Generator (aka Pwgen) before 2.07 uses weak pseudo generated numbers when /dev/urandom is unavailable, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to guess the numbers.

CVE-2013-7401
Published: 2014-12-19
The parse_request function in request.c in c-icap 0.2.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a URI without a " " or "?" character in an ICAP request, as demonstrated by use of the OPTIONS method.

CVE-2014-2026
Published: 2014-12-19
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the search functionality in United Planet Intrexx Professional before 5.2 Online Update 0905 and 6.x before 6.0 Online Update 10 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the request parameter.

CVE-2014-2716
Published: 2014-12-19
Ekahau B4 staff badge tag 5.7 with firmware 1.4.52, Real-Time Location System (RTLS) Controller 6.0.5-FINAL, and Activator 3 reuses the RC4 cipher stream, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain plaintext messages via an XOR operation on two ciphertexts.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Join us Wednesday, Dec. 17 at 1 p.m. Eastern Time to hear what employers are really looking for in a chief information security officer -- it may not be what you think.