Risk
4/26/2010
11:35 AM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

FBI Names Cyber Division Chief

Gordon Snow has experience working on counterterrorism and cybercrimes in Silicon Valley and led the effort to draft a government-wide Cyber Counterintelligence Plan.

The FBI has a new chief responsible for leading the agency's efforts to detect and prevent cyberattacks on U.S. critical infrastructure.

Gordon M. Snow is now assistant director of the FBI's Cyber Division, replacing Shawn Henry, who left the post in January to lead the FBI's Washington Field Office.

Snow most recently was deputy assistant director of the Cyber Division. He has been with the FBI for more than 18 years, starting out as a special agent in Alabama in 1992.

Snow gained significant cybersecurity experience in 2006 as an assistant special agent working in Silicon Valley. At San Francisco Division's San Jose Resident Agency, he was responsible for the counterterrorism, cyber, white-collar crime and violent crime squads.

After a brief stint in Afghanistan the next year, Snow returned to the U.S. and was appointed section chief in the Cyber Division in January 2008. In that role, he led the effort to draft a government-wide Cyber Counterintelligence Plan.

The following year, he was appointed as chief of the Cyber Division's Cyber National Security Section and the director of the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force. Later that year, he was promoted to deputy director of the division.

The White House is bolstering cybersecurity efforts across the administration, especially in agencies charged with protecting the U.S. against terrorism and criminal activity at home and abroad, such as the FBI, the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security.

There is evidence to support the ramp up. In recent testimony during his nomination to lead the U.S. military effort against cyber warfare, Lt. General Keith Alexander said the Department of Defense network alone is hit with hundreds of thousands of probes a day that are attempting to detect vulnerabilities in it to stage an attack.

Moreover, in a recently published report, a group of federal IT pros said they believe a major cyberattack against critical U.S. infrastructure is imminent.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2013-4594
Published: 2014-10-25
The Payment for Webform module 7.x-1.x before 7.x-1.5 for Drupal does not restrict access by anonymous users, which allows remote anonymous users to use the payment of other anonymous users when submitting a form that requires payment.

CVE-2014-0476
Published: 2014-10-25
The slapper function in chkrootkit before 0.50 does not properly quote file paths, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse executable. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when /tmp is not mounted with the noexec option.

CVE-2014-1927
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly quote strings, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "$(" command-substitution sequences, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-1928....

CVE-2014-1928
Published: 2014-10-25
The shell_quote function in python-gnupg 0.3.5 does not properly escape characters, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors, as demonstrated using "\" (backslash) characters to form multi-command sequences, a different vulner...

CVE-2014-1929
Published: 2014-10-25
python-gnupg 0.3.5 and 0.3.6 allows context-dependent attackers to have an unspecified impact via vectors related to "option injection through positional arguments." NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-7323.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.