Risk
3/28/2011
09:18 PM
50%
50%

Do Not Track Momentum Mounts

Legislation to be proposed by Senator John Kerry and analysis of business comments to the FTC may point toward stronger privacy protections.

Will the FTC -- which can advise Congress, but otherwise has little regulatory power -- see Do Not Track become law? When initially released for public comment in December 2010, the FTC's Internet privacy proposal was publicly slammed by the advertising industry, although lauded by privacy rights groups.

Interestingly, however, an analysis of businesses' related comments to the FTC sees widespread support for privacy -- at least as a concept. So said a blog post from attorney Richard Santalesa, senior counsel, Information Law Group, which evaluated all 442 of the comments submitted to the FTC by individuals, organizations, agencies, and businesses. Microsoft, for example, in its submission said that it "supports an industry-wide privacy-by-design principle that encourages businesses to incorporate privacy protections into their data practices and to develop comprehensive privacy programs."

But many businesses raise concerns over Do Not Track and other FTC privacy proposals. These range from hesitation over standardizing on a single approach or technology, to problems with FTC Fair Information Practices.

Facebook, for example, argues that privacy protections should be strengthened so long as users aren't impeded. In addition, it "broadly opines that common Do Not Track 'concerns are not implicated when the user has a relationship with the company [i.e. Facebook] conducting the tracking and understands that the entity may be collecting data,'" said Santalesa. In other words, Facebook wants an opt-out for its users being able to opt out.

Regardless, related privacy laws could arrive soon. On Friday, a draft was leaked of Senator John Kerry's yet to proposed legislation -- the Commercial Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2011 -- that would allow the FTC to develop and enforce rules for how people's personal information is handled.

The act "directs the FTC to make rules requiring certain entities that handle information covered by the act to comply with a host of new requirements protecting the security of the information as well as the privacy of the individuals to whom information pertains," said attorney Nicole Friess, associate, Information Law Group, in a blog post.

The as yet not proposed legislation, which is co-sponsored by Senator John McCain, suggests that privacy will no longer be left to advertisers to safeguard, which is the current approach.

"With the exception of the FTC's enforcement actions cracking down on unfair and deceptive practices, the government has favored industry self-regulation over privacy legislation," Friess said. "Between the new draft of the 'Commercial Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2011,' three separate privacy bills pending in the House, and the Obama administration backing a 'consumer privacy bill of rights,' it looks like change is in the air -- and I'm not just saying that to be clever."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading December Tech Digest
Experts weigh in on the pros and cons of end-user security training.
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-1421
Published: 2014-11-25
mountall 1.54, as used in Ubuntu 14.10, does not properly handle the umask when using the mount utility, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-3605
Published: 2014-11-25
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6407. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-6407. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6407 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to pre...

CVE-2014-7839
Published: 2014-11-25
DocumentProvider in RESTEasy 2.3.7 and 3.0.9 does not configure the (1) external-general-entities or (2) external-parameter-entities features, which allows remote attackers to conduct XML external entity (XXE) attacks via unspecified vectors.

CVE-2014-8001
Published: 2014-11-25
Buffer overflow in decode.cpp in Cisco OpenH264 1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an encoded media file.

CVE-2014-8002
Published: 2014-11-25
Use-after-free vulnerability in decode_slice.cpp in Cisco OpenH264 1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an encoded media file.

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Now that the holiday season is about to begin both online and in stores, will this be yet another season of nonstop gifting to cybercriminals?