Risk
5/16/2013
05:24 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Boston Children's Hospital Tackles Teen Records Privacy

Boston Children's Hospital's pioneering approach would bar parents from seeing sensitive portions of their children's personal health records.

10 Mobile Health Apps From Uncle Sam
10 Mobile Health Apps From Uncle Sam
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The increase in the use of personal health records raises important questions about adolescents' access to their own PHRs and who can view their sensitive personal health information, noted Fabienne Bourgeois, a pediatric hospitalist at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH), in a recent blog post.

Writing on the blog of John Halamka, CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Bourgeois pointed out that children's and adolescents' PHRs are generally controlled by their parents. However, teenagers have a right to privacy when they share confidential information with their physicians, she noted. Often, this includes data about reproductive health, sexually transmitted diseases, substance abuse and mental health that adolescents might not want to share with their parents.

"As it turns out, this type of confidential information is pervasive throughout most EHRs," noted Bourgeois, who is also the clinical lead on applications at BCH. And it is EHRs that are the main source for the PHRs that reside on patient portals.

[ Bill Clinton spoke out against kids' obesity at recent health conference. Read Bill Clinton Stumps For Health IT At HIMSS. ]

To address these issues, BCH has developed a custom-built PHR with separate accounts for patients and parents. Bourgeois wrote, "The parent has sole access to the patient's portal until the patient turns 13, at which point both the parent and the patient can have access. … At 18 years, the patient becomes the sole owner of the portal account, and we deactivate the parent's link (unless we receive court documents stating that the parent remains the medical guardian)."

The federal HIPAA law dictates that the patient have sole control over his or her PHR at age 18, because an 18-year-old is defined as an adult with full privacy rights under HIPAA, Bourgeois told InformationWeek Healthcare. But soon, BCH will give adolescents over 18 the ability to share their information with "select individuals," including parents. They also will be able to choose which categories of information they want to share.

BCH has identified and tagged sensitive information from the EHR, including labs related to pregnancy, sexually transmitted illnesses (STIs), genetic results, select confidential appointments, and potentially sensitive problems and medications.

"This information is currently filtered from both parent and adolescent accounts, but in the near future the sensitive information will flow to the adolescent account, but not to the parent account," Bourgois said in the article. "So, even if a patient is less than 13 years, the parent would not have access to this information."

Asked why BCH would prevent parents from obtaining such information for children under 13 years old, she said every family is different and has a different relationship with its physician. "In one family, we'll disclose information around STIs in a 10-year-old, if we feel that the patient is at risk and it's appropriate to give that information to the family," she said.

However, she added, sending that information to a patient portal that includes a PHR might not be the best way to communicate it. "Some of this information is best handled in a person-to-person conversation with a provider," she said.

In her post, Bourgeois offered a couple of alternative ways to handle adolescent PHRs. One method would be to provide shared access for patient and parent, but filter out all sensitive information. Another approach would be to provide access only to the adolescent and include sensitive data.

Why would a healthcare organization want to cut off parents' access to their children's health records before they turned 18? "Some practices have found that hiding sensitive information is something that's more complicated than they can manage," Bourgeois replied in the interview. "They don't have the ability to tag information and filter the sensitive information, which is just littered throughout the EHR. Therefore, they allow access to the adolescent only."

BCH is also trying to deal with the problem of sensitive data hidden in unstructured parts of the EHR, such as clinical notes. "The approach we're taking with clinical notes is that we're going to create a particular type of note called confidential notes," Bourgeois said. "In addition, we're allowing providers to decide whom the note can go to. If they're going to push the note to the portal, they can choose whether it should go to the parent, the adolescent patient, or both."

This is not an ideal solution, because it puts the onus for protecting the privacy of this information on the physician, she acknowledged. But it's the best mechanism her institution could come up with for now, she said.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
jaysimmons
50%
50%
jaysimmons,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/30/2013 | 2:24:05 AM
re: Boston Children's Hospital Tackles Teen Records Privacy
This article raises a very valid point when it comes to doctor-patient confidentiality in the case where the patient isnGÇÖt over 18 years of age. Man adolescents may be afraid to see a physician for fear of their parents finding out that what they have been doing and may be putting their health at risk. I like the idea of having a patient portal for the patient and one for the guardian where they can filter the type of information available to each user. I do believe though that the physician should have enough good sense that they could filter out this information manually until a better mechanism has been developed for their EHRs.

Jay Simmons
Information Week Contributor
PJS880
50%
50%
PJS880,
User Rank: Ninja
6/17/2013 | 1:07:57 AM
re: Boston Children's Hospital Tackles Teen Records Privacy
This is one of the most
ridiculous things that I ever read. How can they deny the parent the knowledge
of a mental health issue in their 13 year old? The HIPAA Laws were put in place
to protect adults privacy, their children should fall under their guardians on
this, not completely separate. A person is not considered an adult until 18 for
a reason, one of those is they are not capable of making appreciate health
decisions regarding their personal health,

Paul Sprague

InformationWeek Contributor
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
Partner Perspectives
What's This?
In a digital world inundated with advanced security threats, Intel Security seeks to transform how we live and work to keep our information secure. Through hardware and software development, Intel Security delivers robust solutions that integrate security into every layer of every digital device. In combining the security expertise of McAfee with the innovation, performance, and trust of Intel, this vision becomes a reality.

As we rely on technology to enhance our everyday and business life, we must too consider the security of the intellectual property and confidential data that is housed on these devices. As we increase the number of devices we use, we increase the number of gateways and opportunity for security threats. Intel Security takes the “security connected” approach to ensure that every device is secure, and that all security solutions are seamlessly integrated.
Featured Writers
White Papers
Cartoon
Current Issue
Dark Reading's October Tech Digest
Fast data analysis can stymie attacks and strengthen enterprise security. Does your team have the data smarts?
Flash Poll
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-0619
Published: 2014-10-23
Untrusted search path vulnerability in Hamster Free ZIP Archiver 2.0.1.7 allows local users to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse dwmapi.dll that is located in the current working directory.

CVE-2014-2230
Published: 2014-10-23
Open redirect vulnerability in the header function in adclick.php in OpenX 2.8.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the (1) dest parameter to adclick.php or (2) _maxdest parameter to ck.php.

CVE-2014-7281
Published: 2014-10-23
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Shenzhen Tenda Technology Tenda A32 Router with firmware 5.07.53_CN allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that reboot the device via a request to goform/SysToolReboot.

CVE-2014-7292
Published: 2014-10-23
Open redirect vulnerability in the Click-Through feature in Newtelligence dasBlog 2.1 (2.1.8102.813), 2.2 (2.2.8279.16125), and 2.3 (2.3.9074.18820) allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the url parameter to ct.ashx.

CVE-2014-8071
Published: 2014-10-23
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in OpenMRS 2.1 Standalone Edition allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) givenName, (2) familyName, (3) address1, or (4) address2 parameter to registrationapp/registerPatient.page; the (5) comment parameter to all...

Best of the Web
Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
Follow Dark Reading editors into the field as they talk with noted experts from the security world.